2014
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ASTRAL: genome-scale coalescent-based species tree estimation

Abstract: Motivation: Species trees provide insight into basic biology, including the mechanisms of evolution and how it modifies biomolecular function and structure, biodiversity and co-evolution between genes and species. Yet, gene trees often differ from species trees, creating challenges to species tree estimation. One of the most frequent causes for conflicting topologies between gene trees and species trees is incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), which is modelled by the multi-species coalescent. While many methods h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
1,030
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,100 publications
(1,093 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
10
1,030
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For the 273 loci, we created 100 multilocus bootstraps (Seo, 2008) that resample both loci within the dataset and bases within a locus. We used three methods of species tree inference: (1) accurate species tree algorithm (ASTRAL; Mirarab et al., 2014), (2) maximum pseudo‐likelihood of estimating species trees (MP‐EST; Liu, Yu, & Edwards, 2010), and (3) species trees from average ranks of coalescence (STAR; Liu et al., 2009). In these analyses, the A. sagrei sample designated the outgroup.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the 273 loci, we created 100 multilocus bootstraps (Seo, 2008) that resample both loci within the dataset and bases within a locus. We used three methods of species tree inference: (1) accurate species tree algorithm (ASTRAL; Mirarab et al., 2014), (2) maximum pseudo‐likelihood of estimating species trees (MP‐EST; Liu, Yu, & Edwards, 2010), and (3) species trees from average ranks of coalescence (STAR; Liu et al., 2009). In these analyses, the A. sagrei sample designated the outgroup.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, fully parametric coalescent models such as *BEAST [79] and BEST [80], which co-estimate gene trees and the species tree [81], cannot be applied to large datasets because they are massively computationally intensive [19]. As such, shortcut coalescence methods such as STEAC, STAR [76], MP-EST [54] and ASTRAL [82], which carry out separate estimation of gene trees and the species tree, have been applied to large mammalian datasets [7,21] (table 3). Criticisms aimed at recent applications of these shortcut methods to the placental tree have focused on inappropriate coalescent-gene (c-gene) size and high levels of gene tree reconstruction error [10].…”
Section: Morphology Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2014). The 130 ML gene trees (best trees) inferred using RA × ML were used as input, and local posterior probabilities were estimated to provide support for relationships.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%