2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0379-0738(02)00459-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ASTM standards for fire debris analysis: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Según [24] la sociedad técnica para pruebas y materiales (ASTM) ha proporcionado normas para el análisis de residuos generados por procesos térmicos desde 1990. Los cambios más importantes se han presentado en las dos principales normas para el análisis de residuos líquidos inflamables ASTM E 1387 y ASTM E 1618 para cromatografía de gases (GC) y espectrometría de gasesespectrometría de masas (GC-MS), respectivamente.…”
Section: Junclassified
“…Según [24] la sociedad técnica para pruebas y materiales (ASTM) ha proporcionado normas para el análisis de residuos generados por procesos térmicos desde 1990. Los cambios más importantes se han presentado en las dos principales normas para el análisis de residuos líquidos inflamables ASTM E 1387 y ASTM E 1618 para cromatografía de gases (GC) y espectrometría de gasesespectrometría de masas (GC-MS), respectivamente.…”
Section: Junclassified
“…Two reviews, one describing the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards for fire debris analysis [206], and the other listing recent advances in a variety of areas related to fire debris analysis, have also been published [207]. An overview of the first five collaborative tests for ignitable liquid analysis conducted by the Fire and Explosion Investigation Working Group of the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENFSI) has been reported [208].…”
Section: General Ignitable Liquid Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the older system (Table 1) uses both names and numbers, the current system (Table 2) uses a two-dimensional approach, with more categories being defined and each category divided into three subcategories, with the exception of gasoline. This revision was necessary to accommodate the evolution of the petroleum industry with many new products being developed, products that in the old system would all have been classed in the ''0'' (miscellaneous) category, with the result that the number of subcategories exceeded the number of classes (7).…”
Section: Accelerantsmentioning
confidence: 99%