Abstract:Early postoperative and long-term follow-ups showed effective and stable correction of astigmatism after implantation of a foldable toric posterior chamber silicone IOL.
“…O nosso estudo mostrou que a média da rotação da LIO foi de 3,2º, onde 95% das LIOs tiveram rotação menor ou igual a 10º, o que se traduz em uma estabilidade rotacional muito boa se compararmos com estudos como o de Shimizu et al (9) ou Ruhswurm et al (16) , os quais obtiveram rotações de até 30º com suas médias girando em torno de 15º de rotação, em nosso trabalho a rotação máxima foi de 13º. Trabalhos mais modernos como o de Till et al (17) mostram que 11% dos pacientes apresentaram rotação da LIO de até 15º, contra 5% observado no presente estudo.…”
“…O nosso estudo mostrou que a média da rotação da LIO foi de 3,2º, onde 95% das LIOs tiveram rotação menor ou igual a 10º, o que se traduz em uma estabilidade rotacional muito boa se compararmos com estudos como o de Shimizu et al (9) ou Ruhswurm et al (16) , os quais obtiveram rotações de até 30º com suas médias girando em torno de 15º de rotação, em nosso trabalho a rotação máxima foi de 13º. Trabalhos mais modernos como o de Till et al (17) mostram que 11% dos pacientes apresentaram rotação da LIO de até 15º, contra 5% observado no presente estudo.…”
“…A similar incidence of rotation even in vitrectomized eyes may be attributable to modified L-shaped haptic design and adhesive properties of the AcrySof toric IOL. 8,14 Another reason could be no tamponade during vitrectomy.…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies mentioned various toric IOLs and found this method effective in correcting astigmatism. [8][9][10] Plate haptic and loop haptic toric IOLs have been used for about a decade, but are associated with postoperative rotational instability. 11 Recently, AcrySof toric IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA) had good rotational stability and favorable efficacy in patients with cataracts and corneal astigmatism.…”
Aim To compare AcrySof toric intraocular lens (IOL) and non-toric IOL in patients who had combined 23-gauge microincisional vitrectomy surgery (MIVS) and phacoemulsification for vitreoretinal diseases and cataract with pre-existing corneal astigmatism. Methods This is a prospective comparative study comprised of 30 patients (30 eyes) who had combined 23-gauge MIVS and phacoemulsification for vitreoretinal diseases and cataract with pre-existing regular corneal astigmatism greater than 1 diopters (D). In all, 15 eyes had AcrySof toric IOL (Alcon Laboratories) and 15 eyes had non-toric IOL (Akreos AO MI60; Bausch & Lomb) implantation. Main outcome measures were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), refractive cylinder, surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), and IOL misalignment during 6 months. Results The mean UCVA of the toric IOL group was better than the non-toric IOL group at postoperative months 1, 3, and 6 (Po0.001, respectively). The mean absolute residual refractive cylinder of the toric IOL group at postoperative week 1, and months 1, 3, and 6 was less than the non-toric IOL group (P ¼ 0.008, o0.001, o0.001, and o0.001, respectively). There was no difference in the mean SIA between the two groups (P40.05, respectively). The mean toric IOL axis rotation was 3.52±2.751, which was within 51 in 66.7% of the toric IOL group and within 101 in 100%.Conclusions Combined 23-gauge MIVS and phacoemulsification with AcrySof toric IOL implantation is an effective method of correcting vitreoretinal diseases and cataract and pre-existing corneal astigmatism, and the toric IOL showed good rotational stability, even in vitrectomized eyes for 6 months.
“…(Alio, Agdeppa et al 2010) Furthermore, based on a vector analysis of the refractive outcomes, the Acri.Comfort IOL has been shown to correct 91% of pre-existing astigmatism. (Alio, Agdeppa et al 2010) (Ruhswurm, Scholz et al 2000;Leyland, Zinicola et al 2001;Till, Yoder et al 2002) www.intechopen.com N = number of eyes; FU = follow-up; SD = standard deviation; D = dioptres; ° = degrees; % = percentage; UDVA = uncorrected distance visual acuity; BDVA = best-corrected distance visual acuity; VPI = visual potential index; RCT = randomised controlled trial; PCS = prospective cohort study; RS = retrospective study; * = converted from LogMAR to Snellen; ^= obtained by wavefront abberometry Table 2. Literature on monofocal toric IOLs (%) www.intechopen.com…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.