O Oc cc cu up pa at ti io on na al l a as st th hm ma a, , r rh hi in ni it ti is s a an nd d u ur rt ti ic ca ar ri ia a d du ue e t to o p pi ip pe er ra ac ci il ll li in n s so od di iu um m i in n a a p ph ha ar rm ma ac ce eu ut ti ic ca al l w wo or rk ke er r G. Moscato, E. Galdi, J. Scibilia, A. Dellabianca, P. Omodeo, G. Vittadini, G.P. BiscaldiOccupational asthma, rhinitis and urticaria due to piperacillin sodium in a pharmaceutical worker. G. Moscato, E. Galdi, J. Scibilia, A. Dellabianca, P. Omodeo, G. Vittadini, G.P. Biscaldi. ©ERS Journals Ltd 1995. ABSTRACT: A 28 year old man with no history of atopy was referred to our hospital for possible work-related asthma. He had been employed in the production section of a pharmaceutical company for 2 yrs, and in the last 2 months he had complained of dyspnoea, wheezing, chest tightness, symptoms of rhinitis and a cutaneous rash when exposed to powdered antibiotics. Symptoms disappeared after being transferred to the packaging section. When the subject was admitted to our department he was asymptomatic. Basal lung function tests were in the normal range. Bronchial challenges with methacholine and with ultrasonically-nebulized distilled water were negative. Skin-prick test with piperacillin sodium gave a strong positive response at a very low concentration. Specific inhalation challenge with piperacillin sodium resulted in an immediate asthmatic reaction, and also reproduced rhinitis symptoms and the cutaneous rash. A control challenge with lactose, and the specific challenge test with cefuroxime sodium (another antibiotic to which the patient was exposed at the workplace) were negative.We conclude that piperacillin sodium is an agent that can cause occupational asthma. Eur Respir J., 1995, 8, 467-679
Case reportA 28 year old man was referred to our department because of suspected occupational asthma. The subject had worked as a driver from the age of 23 to 25 yrs. In the last 30 months he had worked in a pharmaceutical company. He was first assigned to work in the production department, where different drugs, including cefuroxime sodium and piperacillin sodium (a semi-synthetic broad-spectrum penicillin) ( fig. 1) were produced. His job consisted of pouring the drug powders from a can into the feed chute of the machine, which later poured small quantities of the powder in vials. He also checked that the machine operated properly. The production process was enclosed and the machine was equipped with local exhaust fans on the feed chute for lowering the dispersed powder concentration. During his work, the subject wore protective clothing which did not protect the mouth and nose. The mouth and nose were covered by a mask (without particle filter), the eyes were protected by goggles, and the hands by gloves.Twenty two months after starting his job, the patient noticed the appearance of a cutaneous rash, sneezing, rhinorrhoea, nasal stuffiness and itching whilst present at the workplace. On one occasion, outside the production department, whilst handling an...