with bicarbonate fluid (p<005). Mean arterial blood pressure fell at a mean rate of 3 9 (0 90) mm Hg/hour during dialysis with acetate fluid (p<001) and 1-4 (0 52) mm Hg/hour during dialysis with bicarbonate fluid (p<005). The rate of fall was significantly greater during dialysis with acetate than with bicarbonate fluid (p<0 02). The index of venous tone rose at a mean rate of 0-23 (0-05) ml/dl over 40 mm Hg/hour during dialysis with acetate fluid (p<001) and 0-20 (0 05) ml/dl over 40 mm Hg/hour during dialysis with bicarbonate fluid (p<001). Vascular resistance in the forearm increased at a mean rate of [3][4][5][6] (1-12) units/hour during dialysis with acetate fluid (p<002) and 4-5 (1-48) units/hour during dialysis with bicarbonate fluid (p<0 01). There were no significant differences in the changes in venous tone or vascular resistance between dialysis with acetate and bicarbonate fluid.
DiscussionThe results of this study point to important abnormalities of the control of the peripheral circulation during dialysis that may contribute to the development of hypotension. The normal responses to a reduction in plasma volume such as that occurring during dialysis are venoconstriction and an increase in peripheral vascular resistance.7 Both of these mechanisms help to prevent a fall in blood pressure. The venoconstriction compensates for the reduced central plasma volume and maintains cardiac filling pressures and thereby cardiac output. The increase in peripheral vascular resistance helps maintain blood pressure despite a fall in cardiac output. Our patients showed a normal increase in peripheral vascular resistance during dialysis, but paradoxically their veins dilated. This venodilatation would accentuate the fall in central blood volume and lead to a fall in cardiac filling pressures and cardiac output and then to hypotension. Evidence supporting this as the mechanism of hypotension during dialysis is that an infusion of fluid often corrects the hypotension.The reason for the abnormal dilatation of the venous bed is unclear. It occurred equally during both types of dialysis and therefore is not due to the vasodilating properties of acetate. It does not seem to be due to autonomic dysfunction as there were appropriate changes in heart rate and peripheral resistance during dialysis, and the veins actively dilated. It is more likely that the correction of the metabolic derangements of renal failure withdrew a stimulus to venoconstriction. Whatever the mechanism, simple measures-for example, wearing support stockings-aimed at reducing pooling of blood in peripheral veins may prevent hypotension induced by dialysis.