2013
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asteroid rotation excitation by subcatastrophic impacts

Abstract: Photometric observations of asteroids show that some of them are in non-principal axis rotation state (free precession), called tumbling. Collisions between asteroids have been proposed as a possible asteroid rotation excitation mechanism. We simulated subcatastrophic collisions between asteroids of various physical and material parameters to find out whether they could be responsible for the excited rotation. For every simulated target body after the collision, we computed its rotational lightcurve and we fou… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a set of mechanical properties of the target and the projectile, which can be varied in a physically plausible range. We did this to some extent in our previous paper, Henych & Pravec (2013), and we found that these values affect the size of an impact crater formed on the surface of the target asteroid. Therefore, they affect the timescale of increasing elongation of the target's shape.…”
Section: Increasing Elongation Of the Model Asteroidmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…There is a set of mechanical properties of the target and the projectile, which can be varied in a physically plausible range. We did this to some extent in our previous paper, Henych & Pravec (2013), and we found that these values affect the size of an impact crater formed on the surface of the target asteroid. Therefore, they affect the timescale of increasing elongation of the target's shape.…”
Section: Increasing Elongation Of the Model Asteroidmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The degree of dissipation is not fully understood, and depends on the assumed parameters of rigidity, µ, which measures the stiffness of the body; the quality factor, Q, which is inversely proportional to the rate of energy dissipation due to non-uniform deformations; and the rate at which tumblers are created. We note that tumblers can be created in several ways: catastrophic disruptions (Asphaug and Scheeres, 1999;Scheeres et al, 2000b), planetary flybys (Scheeres et al, 2000b(Scheeres et al, , 2005Pravec et al, 2014), YORP-induced fission (Sánchez and Scheeres, 2014), and, potentially, YORP spindown effects either in isolation (Vokrouhlickỳ et al, 2007) or in combination with impacts (Marzari et al, 2011;Henych and Pravec, 2013).…”
Section: Tidal Dissipationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumbling can be brought about by collisions 14 , tidal torques in planetary close encounters 15 , cometary activity 16 , or the YORP effect 17 . It is eventually damped by internal friction and stressstrain forces removing the excess of rotational energy above that of the basic rotational state around the body's principal axis with largest moment of inertia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%