2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0019-1035(02)00020-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asteroid photometric and polarimetric phase curves: empirical interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New observations were combined with the old data set and were analyzed using the lightcurve inversion method (Kaasalainen et al 2001(Kaasalainen et al , 2003b. The new physical model is very close to the previous one: λ = 48…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…New observations were combined with the old data set and were analyzed using the lightcurve inversion method (Kaasalainen et al 2001(Kaasalainen et al , 2003b. The new physical model is very close to the previous one: λ = 48…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…4. The data were fitted with a linear-exponential function as described by Kaasalainen et al (2003). Similar curves were obtained by fitting the data with either a trigonometric fit (Lumme & Muinonen 1993) or parabolic fit.…”
Section: Polarimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our new observations were combined with the older data of Wisniewski et al (1997) and Székely et al (2005), and analysed using the lightcurve inversion method of Kaasalainen and collaborators (e.g., Kaasalainen et al 2001Kaasalainen et al , 2003. This procedure provides a simultaneous solution of the fundamental rotation parameters, rotation period P, and pole position (λ, β), in addition to parameters describing the irregular shape of the asteroid.…”
Section: Spin State and Shape Of (1270) Daturamentioning
confidence: 99%