Associative Memory and Political Decision Making

Abstract

Citizens are continuously inundated with political information. How do citizens process that information for use in decision-making? Political psychologists have generally thought of information processing as proceeding through a series of stages: (1) exposure and attention; (2) comprehension; (3) encoding, interpretation, and elaboration; (4) organization and storage in memory; and (5) retrieval. This processing of information relies heavily on two key structures: working memory and long-term memory. Working memory actively processes incoming information whereas long-term memory is the storage structure of the brain. The most widely accepted organizational scheme for long-term memory is the associative network model. In this model, information stored in long-term memory is organized as a series of connected nodes. Each node in the network represents a concept with links connecting the various concepts. The links between nodes represent beliefs about the connection between concepts. These links facilitate retrieval of information through a process known as spreading activation. Spreading activation moves information from long-term memory to working memory. When cued nodes are retrieved from memory, they activate linked nodes thereby weakly activating further nodes and so forth. Repeatedly activated nodes are the most likely to be retrieved from long-term memory for use in political decision-making. The concept of an associative network model of memory has informed a variety of research avenues, but several areas of inquiry remain underdeveloped. Specifically, many researchers rely on an associative network model of memory without questioning the assumptions and implications of the model. Doing so might further inform our understanding of information processing in the political arena. Further, voters are continuously flooded with political and non-political information; thus, exploring the role that the larger information environment can play in information processing is likely to be a fruitful path for future inquiry. Finally, little attention has been devoted to the various ways a digital information environment alters the way citizens process political information. In particular, the instantaneous and social nature of digital information may short-circuit information processing.

Race, Gender, and the U.S. Presidency: A Comparison of Implicit and Explicit Biases in the Electorate

“…However, the evaluative priming paradigm offers several advantages over the IAT. These include: (i) A relatively shorter task duration (often five times shorter than the IAT), thus minimizing respondent fatigue; (ii) The effect is based purely on response latencies rather than on errors made during the task (response confusion); and (iii) Unlike the IAT, for which there is no clear theoretical explanation as to how or why it works, evaluative priming has a clear theoretical underpinning, namely, associative network theory [ 26 ], which includes political decision making [ 27 ]. Specifically, unlike the IAT, evaluative priming works because it is based on assumptions that are highly compatible with what is known about how the brain processes information [ 28 ].…”