1998
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/31/13/014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associative ionization in collisions of with and

Abstract: Absolute cross sections of the associative ionization in the collision of He + with H − or D − have been measured in a merged beam experiment over a relative velocity interval ranging from 0.4 to 5 × 10 6 cm s −1 . At a given relative velocity, the two cross sections significantly differ at low velocities where the cross section for HeD + formation exceeds that of HeH + by as much as 35%. The difference, however, decreases with the velocity and falls in the experimental error above 2 × 10 6 cm s −1 . In both c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard deviation of the mean [27] is 0.02 x 10-21 m2, about 0.5% of the mean, highlighting the excellent repeatability of our measurements and providing the statistical error. Uncertainties arising from systematic effects are estimated as follows: the powermeter accuracy of 3% is given by the manufacturer; the vertical displacement of the laser beam is known with 2% precision, as estimated from the comparison of measured and calculated values; the 1% error on the current measurement is obtained by comparing the current measured by the two Faraday cups FC1 and FC2 and corresponds to the calibration accuracy of the electrometer; an uncertainty of 1% on the ions' velocity is given by the small variations of the source's acceleration voltage (4 kV); the uncertainty of 2% on the detection efficiency of the CEM has been previously established by Naji et al [25]. Each of these values provide an upper limit a+ and a lower limit to the exact value a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The standard deviation of the mean [27] is 0.02 x 10-21 m2, about 0.5% of the mean, highlighting the excellent repeatability of our measurements and providing the statistical error. Uncertainties arising from systematic effects are estimated as follows: the powermeter accuracy of 3% is given by the manufacturer; the vertical displacement of the laser beam is known with 2% precision, as estimated from the comparison of measured and calculated values; the 1% error on the current measurement is obtained by comparing the current measured by the two Faraday cups FC1 and FC2 and corresponds to the calibration accuracy of the electrometer; an uncertainty of 1% on the ions' velocity is given by the small variations of the source's acceleration voltage (4 kV); the uncertainty of 2% on the detection efficiency of the CEM has been previously established by Naji et al [25]. Each of these values provide an upper limit a+ and a lower limit to the exact value a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neutral hydrogen atoms fly straight through the quadrupole and are detected about 30 cm downstream by a CEM (KBL 25 RS, Dr. Sjuts Optotechnik). Two parameters affect the detection of neutrals by the CEM: the detection efficiency r) and the value of the counting rate N. The efficiency is estimated to be 0.98 ± 0.02 according to Naji et al [25], who measured the efficiency of the exact same detector model. Furthermore, test measurements for a 6-keV beam showed no significant increase of the detection efficiency, suggesting that 7 ] has reached the asymptotic regime of efficiency versus particle energy, as expected from the CEM specifications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the help of the merged ion beam apparatus implanted in Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium, we were able to investigate various combinations of reactants to form diatomics and triatomics [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Since technical details, not relevant here, were described elsewhere, for instance in [17], they will not be repeated. Among them, we select three emblematic cases to illustrate the specificities of the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent paper [1], we presented an experimental study of associative ionization in the collision of He + with H − and D − . In this paper, a new set of measurements is reported dealing with the associative ionization of H + 2 and D + 2 with H − and D − .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of them is associative ionization in the collision of H + 2 with H − and is dealt with in this paper. The cross sections of the following reactions have been measured: The experimental set-up used for the measurements was the same as that described in [1]. A beam of H + 2 (or D + 2 ) produced by an ECR source, was merged with a beam of H − (or D − ) and the reaction products formed in a region delimited by a bias voltage were separated by a magnetic analyser and detected by a channel electron multiplier.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%