2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2009.5459248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associative hierarchical CRFs for object class image segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
509
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 450 publications
(513 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
509
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ladický et al [11] showed how multiple such features and priors can be combined, avoiding the need to make an a priori decision of which is most appropriate. Their Associative Hierarchical Random Field (AHRF) model has demonstrated state of the art results for several semantic segmentation problems.…”
Section: Segmentation Priorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ladický et al [11] showed how multiple such features and priors can be combined, avoiding the need to make an a priori decision of which is most appropriate. Their Associative Hierarchical Random Field (AHRF) model has demonstrated state of the art results for several semantic segmentation problems.…”
Section: Segmentation Priorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semantic segmentation has attracted a lot of attention, but most works have focused on the fully supervised setting, where pixel labels are given for the training images [15,14,12,21,22,26]. The basic approach was formulated in [22], where a conditional random field (CRF) was defined over image pixels with unary potentials learnt by a boosted decision tree classifier over texture-layout filters.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is very challenging because the method has to recover latent pixel labels from just presence labels, before it can generalize from the training set to test images. Recently there has been significant progress in fully supervised semantic segmentation [15,14,12,21,22,26], although the problem is still unsolved. The disadvantage of fully supervised techniques is the need for manually labeling pixels in the training set, which is time consuming and expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher-order clique potentials have the capability to model complex interactions of random variables. Compared with the pairwise model, experiments [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] showed superior results by introducing higher-order cliques, making it essential to find an efficient algorithm to solve higher-order energies. Although many methods have been proposed, the energy forms are simple and specified, which is far behind the need of effectively describing the underlying problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many methods have been proposed, the energy forms are simple and specified, which is far behind the need of effectively describing the underlying problem. Many of existing methods simply added a specified clique term to the pairwise energy, and solved the higher-order energies using either moving making algorithms, [7][8][9]13] or belief propagation, [11] or message passing. [10,12] Such inference algorithms are scale exponentially with the size of the maximal clique in the graph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%