1995
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associative EPSP‐‐spike potentiation induced by pairing orthodromic and antidromic stimulation in rat hippocampal slices.

Abstract: 1. Pairing low-frequency orthodromic stimulation with high-frequency antidromic conditioning of pyramidal cells in area CAI of the rat hippocampus resulted in long-lasting potentiation of the extracellular population spike of the cells, without an accompanying increase in the extracellular excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP), indicating an increase in EPSP-spike (E-S) coupling, also called E-8 potentiation. 2. The amplitude of the antidromically conditioned E-S potentiation took up to 60 min to reach its … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Paired orthodromic and antidromic stimulation has also been used previously to produce an extracellular associative E-S potentiation that was expressed without LTP (Jester et al, 1995). E-S potentiation had not yet been examined intracellularly using an associative LTP induction protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Paired orthodromic and antidromic stimulation has also been used previously to produce an extracellular associative E-S potentiation that was expressed without LTP (Jester et al, 1995). E-S potentiation had not yet been examined intracellularly using an associative LTP induction protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been considerable debate as to the mechanisms underlying E-S potentiation, with studies focusing on increased neuronal excitability (Abraham et al, 1985;Taube and Schwartzkroin, 1988;Wathey et al, 1992;Jester et al, 1995;Daoudal et al, 2002) and decreased efficacy of inhibition (Wilson et al, 1981;Abraham et al, 1987;Chavez-Noriega et al, 1989;Tomasulo et al, 1991;McMahon and Kauer, 1997;Lu et al, 2000;Chevaleyre and Castillo, 2003;Staff and Spruston, 2003). There is substantial evidence that a major component of E-S potentiation relies on GABAergic inhibition, because E-S potentiation is mimicked and occluded Chavez-Noriega et al, 1989;Tomasulo et al, 1991;Lu et al, 2000) or reduced (Daoudal et al, 2002;Staff and Spruston, 2003) by GABA A receptor (GABA A R) antagonists (but see Jester et al, 1995;Evans and Viola-McCabe, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During an E-S potentiation, input specificity is strongly reduced, whether in vitro in CA1 (Jester et al 1995) or in vivo in the DG (Abraham et al 1985). Given the effect of AmmTX3 on E-S potentiation, we can therefore assume that in a behavioral context, AmmTX3 infusion could decrease the signal-to-noise ratio during information encoding.…”
Section: Ammtx3 Prolongs the E-s Component Of Ltpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rapid and short-lasting reduction of I A via an inactivation curve shift during the initial period of potentiation can induce an initial and signifi cant enhancement of excitability throughout the neuron. In fact, activity-dependent changes in somatic I A channels are not unique because various conditioning stimuli for synaptic plasticity actively influence the expression and kinetic properties of several ion channels [1,53,[57][58][59][60] . Furthermore, it is possible that the I A -mediated enhancement of somatic excitability directly affects the properties and/or expression of other voltage-dependent ion channels, and thus modifi es membrane conductance and cellular signaling cascades (for review see Reyes 2001 [61] ).…”
Section: Modifi Cationsmentioning
confidence: 99%