2009
DOI: 10.3758/mc.37.1.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associative and repetition priming with the repeated masked prime technique: No priming found

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also behavioral evidence indicating that unconsciously presented pictures of different objects can prime subsequent picture naming and word categorization (e.g. Dell'Acqua & Grainger, 1999, but see Avons et al, 2009), and that recognizable words can break interocular suppression faster than words in an unfamiliar alphabet (Jiang et al, 2007). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also behavioral evidence indicating that unconsciously presented pictures of different objects can prime subsequent picture naming and word categorization (e.g. Dell'Acqua & Grainger, 1999, but see Avons et al, 2009), and that recognizable words can break interocular suppression faster than words in an unfamiliar alphabet (Jiang et al, 2007). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used 200 semantically-related word pairs taken from published experiments (Anaki & Henik, 2003; Avons, Russo, Cinel, Verolini, Glynn, et al, 2009; Hutchinson, 2002; Rogers & Friedman, 2008; Slowiaczek, 1994; Stolz & Besner, 1998). In the pair, the prime word, e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, given the inconsistent data pattern in the literature on masked semantic priming, this discrepancy does not invalidate our data. In particular, with respect to the centre-surround mechanism, the kind of relationship between the prime and target (associative vs. categorical) may be a precondition for observing the negatively signed priming effect (see Avons et al, 2009). It should also be noted that our study combined the attentional blink and the semantic priming task in such a way that the parameters of the semantic priming task closely resemble the parameters of a traditional semantic priming task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%