2005
DOI: 10.3758/bf03193371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associative and causal reasoning accounts of causal induction: Symmetries and asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic inferences

Abstract: Associative and causal reasoning accounts are probably the two most influential types of accounts of causal reasoning processes. Only causal reasoning accounts predict certain asymmetries between predictive (i.e., reasoning from causes to effects) and diagnostic (i.e., reasoning from effects to causes) inferences regarding cue-interaction phenomena (e.g., the overshadowing effect). In the experiments reported here, we attempted to delimit the conditions under which these asymmetries occur. The results show tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(40 reference statements)
1
22
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the propositional model could be viewed also as a performance-based model. In any case, as a noncausally framed learning task was used, it is unlikely that causal reasoning processes were triggered in the present experiment (see López, Cobos, & Caño, 2005;Luque, et al, 2008). For this reason, the present authors are reluctant to conclude that these results are consistent or not with the propositional model of learning; simply, these models are not easily applicable in the present learning task.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Thus, the propositional model could be viewed also as a performance-based model. In any case, as a noncausally framed learning task was used, it is unlikely that causal reasoning processes were triggered in the present experiment (see López, Cobos, & Caño, 2005;Luque, et al, 2008). For this reason, the present authors are reluctant to conclude that these results are consistent or not with the propositional model of learning; simply, these models are not easily applicable in the present learning task.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Hence, blocking effects should be less likely to occur when the cues are potential effects of the outcome than when they are potential causes of the outcome. This prediction has been verified in several studies (see Lopez, Cobos, & Caño, 2005, for a review).…”
Section: First Core Assumption: Associative Learning Effects Depend Omentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Causal reasoning may or may not be involved in arriving at this conclusion (F. J. López, Cobos, & Caño, 2005). Research on diagnostic reasoning examines to what extent humans engage in reasoning about underlying causal processes when they aim to arrive at a diagnostic judgment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%