2018
DOI: 10.1002/oby.22089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations of Sodium and Potassium with Obesity Measures Among Diverse US Hispanic/Latino Adults: Results from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos

Abstract: Objective To evaluate cross-sectional associations of sodium and potassium with body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and body fat and determine whether nativity/duration of US residence modified these associations. Methods Sodium and potassium were derived from 24-hour diet recalls from 16,156 US participants of the 2008–2011 Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) and from 24-hour urine in 447 HCHS/SOL participants. BMI, WC, and body fat were measured. Results 500 mg/day hi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reasons for exclusion from metaanalyses included; findings were only presented as correlation coefficients (n=16) (35, 54-56, 61, 68, 77, 78, 81, 82, 84, 86, 87, 90, 92, 96) or as standardised regression coefficients (n=4) (57,64,89,94) , the exposure variable was presented as sodium density (n=2) (12,72) or 24-hr urinary sodium excretion was reported as sodium concentration (mmol/L) (74) or on a logarithmic scale (52,58) . Of the studies included in meta-analyses, 14 were from Asia (62,63,66,69,70,73,75,76,83,85,91,97,100,101) , eight from USA (10,11,59,60,71,88,102,103) , five from South and Central America (53,65,79,80,93) , four from Europe (9,67,95,99) , one from Samoa (98) and one included data collected across four countries (e.g. Japan, USA, UK, China) (104) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reasons for exclusion from metaanalyses included; findings were only presented as correlation coefficients (n=16) (35, 54-56, 61, 68, 77, 78, 81, 82, 84, 86, 87, 90, 92, 96) or as standardised regression coefficients (n=4) (57,64,89,94) , the exposure variable was presented as sodium density (n=2) (12,72) or 24-hr urinary sodium excretion was reported as sodium concentration (mmol/L) (74) or on a logarithmic scale (52,58) . Of the studies included in meta-analyses, 14 were from Asia (62,63,66,69,70,73,75,76,83,85,91,97,100,101) , eight from USA (10,11,59,60,71,88,102,103) , five from South and Central America (53,65,79,80,93) , four from Europe (9,67,95,99) , one from Samoa (98) and one included data collected across four countries (e.g. Japan, USA, UK, China) (104) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcomes which were included in separate meta-analyses were BMI (n=31) (9-11, 53, 59, 60, 63, 65-67, 69-71, 73, 75, 76, 79, 80, 83, 85, 88, 93, 95, 97-104) , weight category (n=8) (9,11,63,73,91,97,103,104) , BW (n=7) (60,65,67,71,73,93,101) , WC (n=9) (9,65,66,70,73,75,80,83,100) and abdominal obesity (n=5) (62,66,73,102,103) . Only nine studies adjusted for energy intake (9,10,59,66,73,91,(102)(103)(104) and three studies adjusted for SSB intake (9,11,103) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Identified studies were meta‐analyses (n = 1), RCTs (n = 3), prospective cohort studies (n = 4), retrospective case–control studies (n = 1), cross‐sectional studies (n = 27), case–control studies (n = 1), post hoc analyses of RCTs (n = 2), and quasi‐experimental studies (n = 3). Three studies assessed morbidity outcomes, two studies assessed outcomes related to symptoms/quality of life/functional status, 31 studies assessed clinically relevant surrogate outcomes, including 26 that assessed blood pressure outcomes, and six studies assessed physiologic outcomes . Of these studies, only three studies met the minimum methodological criteria for detailed critical appraisal (Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ion selective electrodes (ISE) are those devices for diagnosing which its amount in the body could maintain the personal mood and behavior and its discrepancies could yield mood disorders [7]. Both of Na and K are very much important for balancing the fluids in and around the cells, maintaining blood pressure, managing the muscle functions and operating the nerve systems [8][9][10]. In one hand; the diagnoses of these elements are important for body health examinations and on the hand; supplying body with these element resources are sometimes dominant for health maintenance [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%