2001
DOI: 10.2527/2001.792347x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations of heart and adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein gene expression with intramuscular fat content in pigs.

Abstract: Intramuscular fat content is a major determinant of meat quality in pigs. Previously, polymorphisms in the adipocyte and heart fatty acid-binding protein genes, A-FABP and H-FABP, have been significantly associated with genetic variation of intramuscular fat content in a Duroc pig population. Further support for the role of H-FABP but not for A-FABP was found in a Meishan crossbred population. However, the effect of closely linked genes could not be excluded in these analyses. To validate the role of A-FABP an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
92
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, Alasnier and colleagues in rabbits [12] failed to show any strict association between the relative proportion of oxidative fibers in various muscles and their respective fat content. Genetic variants of FABP have been associated with muscle lipid content in pigs [37], but their involvement at the protein level remains unclear [38]. Finally, in line with our results, LPL activity has been negatively associated to marbling in cattle [39].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Indeed, Alasnier and colleagues in rabbits [12] failed to show any strict association between the relative proportion of oxidative fibers in various muscles and their respective fat content. Genetic variants of FABP have been associated with muscle lipid content in pigs [37], but their involvement at the protein level remains unclear [38]. Finally, in line with our results, LPL activity has been negatively associated to marbling in cattle [39].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This dependence on the analytical model and the quoted differences in the results obtained in other experiments suggest that the polymorphism responsible for the effect found is not the PCR-RFLP analyzed, but another close polymorphism linked in different phases depending on the population. Moreover, in a recent work Gerbens et al [10] could not explain the variation of IMF in crossbred pigs by differences in mRNA and protein expression levels of H-FABP HaeIII genotypes, although these negative results could be due to limitations of the assays. Although we can conclude that our polymorphism is not the causal mutation of the effect observed, it could have a practical interest as a marker for pig breeding programs aimed at improving meat quality while avoiding a backfat increase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…PPARG2 induction is followed by the expression of multiple genes and proteins including FABP4 that are involved in intracellular fatty acid transportation, cell growth and differentiation, cellular signaling, gene transcription, and modulation of enzyme activity (Heuckeroth et al 1987, Amri et al 1991, Zimmerman & Veerkamp 2002. The FABP with the widest tissue distribution is FABP3 (muscle FABP) that plays a critical role in the uptake and utilization of NEFA, in fuel selection and energy metabolism, and in adult pigs it is genetically linked to intramuscular fat content (Glatz et al 1998, Binas et al 1999, Gerbens et al 2001, Luiken et al 2003. Recent studies have suggested a more wide spread tissue distribution of FABPs (Gardan et al 2007, Li et al 2007) that may be linked to PPAR action (Motojima 2000, Tan et al 2002.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%