Associations of diet and lifestyle factors with common volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath of average-risk individuals

Abstract

Background: Detection of diseases via exhaled breath remains an attractive idea despite persisting gaps in understanding the origin of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and their relationship with the disease of interest. Data on factors potentially influencing the results of breath analysis remain rather sparse and often controversial. In this study, we aimed to investigate the associations of common VOCs in exhaled breath of average-risk individuals with socio-demographic and lifestyle factors, medical conditions as well as diet. Methods: Alveolar breath samples of 1447 men and women were collected in the morning after fasting and were analyzed using gas-chromatography linked with mass-spectrometry. Study participants were 40–64 years old, cancer-free, with overall good health status. The associations between selected VOCs and various factors determined from the questionnaire data were assessed using two-part-Wilcoxon test and Jonckheere–Terpstra trend test. Results: Fifteen VOCs where each of them was detected in at least 80% of the study population were included in this analysis. Statistically significant associations with various VOCs were demonstrated for gender and consumption of certain foods, such as coffee, leeks and garlic, while smoking was not associated with any of the analyzed compounds. Conclusion: Factors potentially modifying the composition of exhaled breath, such as dietary factors, deserve careful attention in the design and analysis of studies accessing the use of VOCs as diagnostic markers.

Screening for gastric cancer using exhaled breath samples

“…The classifier was further evaluated with regard to various potential confounding factors (sex, age, BMI, alcohol consumption, smoking, diet, history of gastrointestinal disease, cardiovascular disease history, asthma, allergies, use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), nationality and physical activity) ( Table S1, supporting information) to validate the integrity of the classifier. The classifier used for the screening was influenced minimally by confounding factors, with random classifications as reflected by ROC analysis (AUC approximately 0·5 for most factors) supporting the validity of the classifier in gastric cancer detection ( Fig .…”

Volatile organic compounds associated with diagnosis and disease characteristics in asthma – A systematic review

“…Recent work in other diseases has shown that diet and lifestyle are important cofounders in breath VOC analysis (90). While this may apply to many of the smaller studies included within this review, with sufficiently large patient cohorts this may not be the case.…”

Sensing gastric cancer via point‐of‐care sensor breath analyzer

“…In most cases, the significant factors explained ~10% of the variance. In the current study, we have evaluated the main confounding that might influence the breath test as studied previously 19,23 . Additional factors may require further evaluation in future studies.…”