2020
DOI: 10.1080/07420528.2020.1752705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations of chronotype, Big Five, and emotional competences with perceived stress in university students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results and effect sizes found in the present study are in keeping with existing literature on the chronotype-affect relationship (e.g. Bakotic et al 2017;Simor et al 2015;You et al 2020). The poorer affective outcomes of E-types in the present sample reflect the results of Tan et al (2020) and their sample of undergraduates where E-types scored lower on a measure of happiness than N-and M-types.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results and effect sizes found in the present study are in keeping with existing literature on the chronotype-affect relationship (e.g. Bakotic et al 2017;Simor et al 2015;You et al 2020). The poorer affective outcomes of E-types in the present sample reflect the results of Tan et al (2020) and their sample of undergraduates where E-types scored lower on a measure of happiness than N-and M-types.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Analysis of the differences between free and constrained days could explore potential dose-response relationship in terms of rhythm misalignment. This would build on work by You et al (2020) that found that the amplitude of variation in energy and motivation across the course of the day was a much stronger correlate with stress than chronotype directly (r= .39 and .14, respectively). Again, a more detailed exploration of the potentially multifactorial nature of chronotype (Konttinen et al 2014;Preckel et al 2019;Putilov 2017;Putilov et al 2015Putilov et al , 2019 may generate more interesting and useful results for how to handle negative affective consequences of circadian rhythm misalignment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Analysis of the differences between free and constrained days could explore potential dose-response relationship in term of rhythm misalignment. This is would build on work by You et al (2020) found that the amplitude of variation in energy and motivation across the course of the day was a much stronger correlate with stress than chronotype directly (r = .39 and .14, respectively). Again, a more detailed exploration of the potentially multifactorial nature of chronotype (Konttinen et al, 2014;Preckel et al, 2019;Putilov, 2017;Putilov, Donskaya, & Verevkin, 2015;Putilov, Marcoen, Neu, Pattyn, & Mairesse, 2019) may generate more interesting and useful results for how to handle negative affective consequences of circadian rhythm misalignment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, a research gap exists regarding the potential influence of SPB on subjective psychological states related to emotion regulation in athletes. Hence, addressing subjective psychological states such as perceived stress intensity, emotional arousal, and emotional valence is of high relevance for athletes, given their influence in sport [ 1 , 11 , 63 , 64 ] as well as in other life domains, such as the academic [ 65 ] or the professional [ 66 ] domains. The subjective effects of SPB have received little attention so far [ 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%