2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:ryso.0000023423.34384.88
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations, civic norms, and democracy: Revisiting the Italian case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies point in a similar direction (Berman 1997;Hagtvet 1980;Kaufman 1999;Koshar 1986;Kwon 2004). The research of Koshar (1986:96), Hagvet (1980), andBerman (1997) has effectively demonstrated that the Weimar Republic in Germany had a dense associational sphere.…”
Section: DI Is Sc Cu Us Ss Si Io On Nmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Other studies point in a similar direction (Berman 1997;Hagtvet 1980;Kaufman 1999;Koshar 1986;Kwon 2004). The research of Koshar (1986:96), Hagvet (1980), andBerman (1997) has effectively demonstrated that the Weimar Republic in Germany had a dense associational sphere.…”
Section: DI Is Sc Cu Us Ss Si Io On Nmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Social capital is often viewed as having two main ingredients: resources and relations. Despite its popularity, the concept has been the subject of substantive critique (Kwon, 2004; Portes, 1998; Portes & Landolt, 2000). It has been stressed that interpretations of social capital that hold more than one variable that could be correlated need to be analytically separated and given independent empirical measures (Portes, 1998).…”
Section: The Theoretical Argument About Structure and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2006; Jan van Deth 2006) and, especially, on the relationship between democratic attitudes, such as social trust and institutional trust, and institutional forms of participation (Norris 2001;Newton 2006;Torcal and Montero 2006). This has raised doubts as to the civic effects of associationalism (Norris 2001;Eliasoph 2001;Wollebaek and Selle 2002;Kwon 2004;Lichterman 2006;Newton 2006). Although not all research raises this doubt regarding democracy and associationalism Hirst 2002;Kwak et al 2004), the question remains.…”
Section: Institutional and Non-institutional Ways Of Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%