Associations between teamwork and implementation outcomes in multidisciplinary cross-sector teams implementing a mental health screening and referral protocol

Abstract

Purpose Teams play a central role in the implementation of new practices in settings providing team-based care. However, the implementation science literature has paid little attention to potentially important team-level constructs. Aspects of teamwork, including team interdependence, team functioning, and team performance, may affect implementation processes and outcomes. This cross-sectional study tests associations between teamwork and implementation antecedents and outcomes in a statewide initiative to implement a standardized mental health screening/referral protocol in Child Advocacy Centers (CACs). Methods Multidisciplinary team members (N = 433) from 21 CACs completed measures of team interdependence; affective, behavioral, and cognitive team functioning; and team performance. Team members also rated the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the screening/referral protocol and implementation climate. The implementation outcomes of days to adoption and reach were independently assessed with administrative data. Associations between team constructs and implementation antecedents and outcomes were tested with linear mixed models and regression analyses. Results Team task interdependence was positively associated with implementation climate and reach, and outcome interdependence was negatively correlated with days to adoption. Task and outcome interdependence were not associated with acceptability, appropriateness, or feasibility of the screening/referral protocol. Affective team functioning (i.e., greater liking, trust, and respect) was associated with greater acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. Behavioral and cognitive team functioning were not associated with any implementation outcomes in multivariable models. Team performance was positively associated with acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and implementation climate; performance was not associated with days to adoption or reach. Conclusions We found associations of team interdependence, functioning, and performance with both individual- and center-level implementation outcomes. Implementation strategies targeting teamwork, especially task interdependence, affective functioning, and performance, may contribute to improving implementation outcomes in team-based service settings.

Facilitation in evidence implementation – experiences, challenges, and determinants of perceived effectiveness: a qualitative systematic review

“…The team of facilitators needs to be explicit about the ways in which it will work and agree on ground rules. Working in teams can reduce feelings of frustration, as individuals can work together to respond to changing expectations and new demands 56 . Undertaking an EI initiative on a priority clinical area where multiple units or sites are involved is ideal in minimizing feelings of isolation and frustration and establishing a network of facilitators who can collaboratively problem-solve.…”

“The project did not come to us with a solution”: Perspectives of research teams on implementing a study about electronic health record-embedded individualized pain plans for emergency department treatment of vaso-occlusive episodes in adults with sickle cell disease

“…In other words, the patients’ eligibility criteria (an ED visit within the past 90 days) demanded high coordination from the study coordinators and clear communication among team members. Communication, trust and relationship have been shown to be important factors in “implementation teams.” An implementation team can be defined as the team in charge of designing and leading the implementation of an intervention [ 35 ], and there is some evidence indicating that teamwork predicts the success of implementation [ 35 , 36 ]. An overarching theme in this study was the importance of coordinators, who often had high trust and respect from the Principal Investigators, patients, and clinic staff to lead and coordinate the study.…”

Advancing research on teams and team effectiveness in implementation science: An application of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework

“…Incorporating evidence-based team interventions may improve the effectiveness of implementation strategies. A new research center (P50MH126231) and ongoing research studies (Kolko et al, 2022; McGuier, Aarons, Wright et al, 2023) focused on developing and testing novel team-based strategies will advance understanding of these implementation strategies.…”

“…Surgical teams implementing the surgical safety checklist (Gillespie et al, 2016). Multidisciplinary child abuse teams implementing mental health screening (McGuier, Aarons, Byrne et al, 2023). New care team Implementation of the innovation requires providers to shift from individual responsibilities and tasks to sharing responsibility and working together.…”

“…Some studies have examined how team effectiveness affects implementation outcomes. One study of teams responding to child abuse found that team members’ subjective perceptions of overall team performance were positively associated with innovation acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility, but not reach ( McGuier, Aarons, Byrne et al, 2023 ).…”