2014
DOI: 10.1080/15555240.2014.866470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations Between Substance Use, Depression, and Work Outcomes: An Evaluation Study of Screening and Brief Intervention in a Large Employee Assistance Program

Abstract: This study examined associations between behavioral health and workplace outcomes for 1,989 state employees served by a large Employee Assistance Program (EAP) over 19 months. Screening and brief intervention was used to identify and intervene for risky substance use and depression at intake. Employees completed psychometrically sound self-report measures of workplace functioning. About 80% of EAP clients screened positive for depression. There was a strong association between depression and impaired workplace… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To increase the evidence base for EAP, it is critical to document, as this study did, that employees receiving EAP improve in work functioning compared to similar employees who do not receive services. Prior studies demonstrate high levels of client satisfaction after receiving services (e.g., Selvik et al, 2004), and single-group pre/post studies show that employees served by EAPs have improved work outcomes (e.g., Richmond et al, 2014; Sharar & Lennox, 2014). However, until this study, the field lacked strong data on the counterfactual condition for EA counseling services—what happens to work-related outcomes in the absence of EAP?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To increase the evidence base for EAP, it is critical to document, as this study did, that employees receiving EAP improve in work functioning compared to similar employees who do not receive services. Prior studies demonstrate high levels of client satisfaction after receiving services (e.g., Selvik et al, 2004), and single-group pre/post studies show that employees served by EAPs have improved work outcomes (e.g., Richmond et al, 2014; Sharar & Lennox, 2014). However, until this study, the field lacked strong data on the counterfactual condition for EA counseling services—what happens to work-related outcomes in the absence of EAP?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, so few cases reported using marijuana on any days (9%) that users were combined into a single category to create a binary variable (0 = no use , 1 = any use ). We elected to exclude a longer drug abuse screening tool due to low rates of reported use of illegal substances in prior evaluations of this population (see Richmond et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Brief screening tools can play a significant part of this integration. For example, alcohol screening is an area of growing interest given evidence‐based guidelines for Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT; McPherson et al., ; Richmond et al., ). Also, recent research shows that the Workplace Outcome Suite (WOS) is an effective tool for assessing the impact of EAP services (e.g., Chestnut Global Partners, ; Sharar & Lennox, ; Sharar, Pompe, & Lennox, ).…”
Section: Part 2—elements Of Integral Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been considerable interest recently in the relationship between depression, substance use and the workplace. This interest is driven by the growing recognition that depressive disorders and substance use are highly prevalent in the workplace and have an enormously negative impact on performance, productivity, absenteeism, and disability costs (1). Currently, depression is the fourth leading cause of disease burden, accounting for 4.4% of total Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) and almost 12% of all total years lived with disability worldwide (2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%