2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03878.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between self‐reported illness and non‐drinking in young adults

Abstract: Young adults who have a limiting long-standing illness are more likely not to drink alcohol even after adjusting for a range of social and demographic measures. Studies on the putative health benefits of moderate alcohol consumption later in life need to take account of early life history.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, if occasional drinkers were used as the reference group (as recommended by some epidemiologists, e.g., Rehm et al, 2008), low-volume drinkers would have RRs close to unity in each of these models (i.e., not be experiencing health protective effects). Evidence that lifetime abstainers have poorer health even before their peers begin drinking (Ng Fat & Shelton, 2012) also provides some support for choosing occasional drinkers as the reference group and is consistent with the observation of increased mortality risk for abstainers (RR = 1.19, 95% CI [1.12, 1.27]) versus occasional drinkers shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Summary Of Evidencesupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Thus, if occasional drinkers were used as the reference group (as recommended by some epidemiologists, e.g., Rehm et al, 2008), low-volume drinkers would have RRs close to unity in each of these models (i.e., not be experiencing health protective effects). Evidence that lifetime abstainers have poorer health even before their peers begin drinking (Ng Fat & Shelton, 2012) also provides some support for choosing occasional drinkers as the reference group and is consistent with the observation of increased mortality risk for abstainers (RR = 1.19, 95% CI [1.12, 1.27]) versus occasional drinkers shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Summary Of Evidencesupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Effective programs to combat alcohol abuse should address an array of factors [49][50][51]. Socially relevant competencies including family, peers, neighborhood climate, geographical location and association between alcohol and other substances, beliefs, attitudes, self-efficacy, and environmental factors need to be further explored regarding Hispanic young adults' involvement in alcohol use [41,52,53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,5]). Other recent contributions include (i) the demonstration of systematic bias early in the life span caused by young adults who choose to be totally abstinent also having poorer health and lower incomes [6]; and (ii) the finding of apparent health benefits associated with moderate drinking from a large and improbably diverse range of diseases, including even liver cirrhosis [7]. Naimi et al [1] also suggest that the lowest risk of all-cause mortality is at a consumption level of only 7 g for men and 5 g for women, involving mainly a frequency of drinking unlikely to confer significant physiological benefits.…”
Section: How Do We Formulate Low-risk Drinking Guidelines If Zero Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would indeed be remarkable if a cognitive benefit could actually arise from prenatal exposure to a known neurotoxin, particularly when RCTs of supplementation with nutrients essential for development such as folate or docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) have not found significant benefit to the cognitive development of offspring [6]. Perhaps even more remarkable, after controlling for a large range of commonly reported confounders, observational data on drinking and health status appears to indicate that the protective effect is not limited to the moderate drinkers themselves but extends its beneficence to the health of the offspring of mothers and fathers who drink [7]. Surely, when such overtly suspect outcomes appear, we should be less inclined to bow to post-hoc rationalizations about plausible biological pathways and more inclined to look for residual confounding from social, economic, psychological and genetic sources.…”
Section: Fishy Cur Ves: a Case Of Bias And Confounding?mentioning
confidence: 99%