2020
DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2019.2585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations Between Ross River Virus Infection in Humans and Vector-Vertebrate Community Ecology in Brisbane, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HI assays were often difficult to standardize [ 28 ] and measuring neutralization titers using mortality readouts in suckling mice [ 29 ] may be complicated by the different abilities of GETV and RRV to replicate in murine systems (see Figure 3 E,F). Circulation of RRV causing human disease in Australia and the Pacific Islands is well described [ 1 , 3 , 4 , 58 ], with a range of animals species (including cows, horses and pigs) also infected [ 30 , 33 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ]. The very high level of overlapping cross-reactivity illustrated herein between sera known to be raised by RRV or GETV infections, argues that it would be difficult to distinguish between past infections with GETV and past infections with RRV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HI assays were often difficult to standardize [ 28 ] and measuring neutralization titers using mortality readouts in suckling mice [ 29 ] may be complicated by the different abilities of GETV and RRV to replicate in murine systems (see Figure 3 E,F). Circulation of RRV causing human disease in Australia and the Pacific Islands is well described [ 1 , 3 , 4 , 58 ], with a range of animals species (including cows, horses and pigs) also infected [ 30 , 33 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ]. The very high level of overlapping cross-reactivity illustrated herein between sera known to be raised by RRV or GETV infections, argues that it would be difficult to distinguish between past infections with GETV and past infections with RRV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of arbovirus transmission to both humans and wildlife is influenced by the environment and is therefore spatially heterogeneous. Distinct patterns of increased human RRV risk in southeast Queensland (SEQ) appear to be driven by environmental changes in vector-vertebrate communities 21 , 28 , but little is known of the factors driving environmental and spatial risks of RRV transmission to endemic wildlife. In the present study, we demonstrate that RRV seropositivity in koalas can be far greater than that reported for other marsupial species 17 , 29 and other circulating arboviruses such as BFV 15 , 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary vertebrate hosts are often assumed to be native macropods (e.g. wallabies and kangaroos), but there is considerable debate as to which animals are the primary hosts in urban landscapes where macropods are uncommon but where spillover to humans is often pronounced 20 , 21 . Although koalas can be locally abundant in the urban landscape as long as suitable green space exists, their relative scarcity and irregular distribution in that environment makes them an unlikely amplifying host for RRV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alteration of weather conditions due to climate change and increased urbanisation may impact the population of vertebrate hosts of Ross River virus in the area, and further studies would be needed to assess these potential impacts. Few models have been developed to investigate the role of vertebrate hosts, although vertebrate biomass, particularly that of horses, has been indicated as an area for future modelling (Choi et al, 2002;Jacups et al, 2008;Skinner et al, 2020). Higher temperatures may decrease or increase viral replication within the mosquito, and rates of disease are also related more broadly to socioeconomic status and public health services available in the area (Githeko et al, 2000;Gage et al, 2008), however as previous studies have linked higher mosquito numbers to increased Ross River virus activity (Choi et al, 2002;Glass, 2005;Tong et al, 2005;Woodruff et al, 2006;Williams et al, 2009), at least some increase in disease incidence could be expected.…”
Section: Mosquito Control Programmes and Mosquito-borne Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%