2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between prenatal multiple plasma metal exposure and newborn telomere length: Effect modification by maternal age and infant sex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since both our dependent variables (TG, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C) and independent variable (MCs) were log-transformed, the results were re-transformed by exponentiating the coefficients and were presented as percent changes [72]. With MCs serv-ing as a continuous exposure variable, using the formula [exp (ln2 × β) − 1] × 100% [73], the regression coefficients were converted and expressed as the percent change in blood lipids with each doubling of the serum MCs levels. On the other hand, the exposure variables were also divided into quartiles and introduced into the models as categorical variables for further analysis, and the percent changes were estimated by comparing each of the upper three quartiles to the lowest quartile using the formula [exp (β) − 1] × 100.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since both our dependent variables (TG, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C) and independent variable (MCs) were log-transformed, the results were re-transformed by exponentiating the coefficients and were presented as percent changes [72]. With MCs serv-ing as a continuous exposure variable, using the formula [exp (ln2 × β) − 1] × 100% [73], the regression coefficients were converted and expressed as the percent change in blood lipids with each doubling of the serum MCs levels. On the other hand, the exposure variables were also divided into quartiles and introduced into the models as categorical variables for further analysis, and the percent changes were estimated by comparing each of the upper three quartiles to the lowest quartile using the formula [exp (β) − 1] × 100.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the linear regression were converted and presented as the percent change. For each doubling of urinary glyphosate concentrations, the formula of (e (ln2× β) -1) × 100% was applied to calculate the percentage change in HbA1c [ 28 ]. Moreover, GLMs were constructed by dividing the urinary glyphosate levels into quartiles and choosing the lowest quartile as the baseline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean RTL was calculated using the 2 -ΔΔCt method recommended by Tang (19) as follows. Relative T/S = 2 –(ΔCt Samples to be tested − ΔCt positive control) , where ΔCt (sample to be tested) is the difference between the CT value of the TEL gene after telomere amplification in the sample to be tested, and the corresponding 36B4 gene CT value and ΔCt (positive control) is the difference between the CT value of the TEL gene after telomere amplification in the DNA telomere of the reference sample of the positive standard and the corresponding 36B4 gene CT value.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These primers were purchased from Invitrogen, USA. The DNA of any qualified sample was selected as the standard and diluted to 200, 100, 50, 25, 12 The mean RTL was calculated using the 2 -ΔΔCt method recommended by Tang (19) as follows. Relative T/S = 2 -(ΔCt Samples to be tested − ΔCt positive control)…”
Section: Collection Of Blood Samples and Measurement Of Relative Telo...mentioning
confidence: 99%