Associations between older adults’ physical fitness level and their engagement in different types of physical activity: cross-sectional results from the OUTDOOR ACTIVE study

Abstract

ObjectivesTo describe the prevalence of different types of physical activities and to explore the association between engagement in these physical activities and performance in the physical fitness dimensions among older adults living in Bremen, Germany.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingTwelve subdistricts in Bremen, Germany.Participants1583 non-institutionalised adults aged 65–75 years residing in one of the 12 subdistricts in Bremen, Germany (53.1% female).Primary outcome measuresLevel of physical fitness in five dimensions: handgrip strength (hand dynamometry), lower muscle strength (30 s-chair stand test), aerobic endurance (2 min-step test), lower body flexibility (sit-and-reach test), and upper body flexibility (back scratch test); classified using normative values.ResultsIn this study population, home-based activities (housework, gardening) and activities for transport (walking, cycling) were performed by nearly all the participants, while leisure activities were less prevalent. Logistic regression revealed a positive association between being in or over norm in handgrip strength with cycling (OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.15), hiking/running (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.05 to 2.16) and other sports (OR: 3.22, 95% CI: 1.37 to 7.56). Lower muscle strength was positively related to cycling (OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.37 to 2.65), gym training (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.16 to 2.26) and dancing (OR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.00 to 4.61). Aerobic endurance was positively associated with cycling (OR: 1.90, 95% CI: 1.37 to 2.65), gym training (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.20 to 2.36), aerobics (OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.19 to 2.26), dancing (OR: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.10 to 6.22) and ball sports (OR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.30 to 3.29). Apart from housework and upper body flexibility (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.78), flexibility dimensions did not show any significant associations.ConclusionsWhile muscle strength dimensions and aerobic endurance were associated with several physical activities, flexibility dimensions were associated with none of the investigated activities apart from housework. Especially cycling and leisure activities (eg, hiking/ running, gym training, aerobics, dancing) showed great potential for sustaining and increasing physical fitness in older age.

Climate Disaster and Cognitive Ability: Evidence From Wildfire

“…First, there are significant differences between different age groups in their own physical fitness, escape skills, and level of knowledge about wildfires, which directly affects an individual’s ability to cope when faced with a fire [ 43 , 44 ]. In addition, there are significant differences in attention and memory capacity, executive functioning, and abstract thinking across ages, which can affect an individual’s ability to perceive and cope with the environment.…”

Associations between objectively measured overall and intensity-specific physical activity and phase angle in older adults

“…Segmental assessment of PhA could potentially serve as an effective means to monitor the health status of specific body parts in older population 21 . Considering the potential variability in the relationship between PA and different body segments 22 , 23 , it is also recognized that in healthy older adults, disparities exist between the body composition of upper and lower limbs. For instance, lean body mass is associated with upper limb strength, whereas higher body fat has been shown to constrain lower limb performance and endurance 24 .…”

Does the 2d:4d ratio present a relationship with static strength indicators in elite paralympic power-lifting?

“…The practice of strength sports has become increasingly popular worldwide (Albrecht et al, 2023), and special groups, people with disabilities and olders (Aidar et al, 2012(Aidar et al, , 2018DE Matos et al, 2017;Mazini Filho et al, 2018). Among the most practiced strength activities, gym activities and powerlifting stand out, both in conventional and Paralympic modalities (Aidar, Clemente, de Lima, et al, 2021;Fonseca et al, 2020;D.…”