Please cite this article as: Sweeny, J.P.A., Robertson, I.D., Ryan, U.M., Jacobson, C., Woodgate, R.G., Impacts of naturally acquired protozoa and strongylid nematode infections on growth and faecal attributes in lambs, Veterinary Parasitology (2010Parasitology ( ), doi:10.1016Parasitology ( /j.vetpar.2011 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.Page 1 of 39 A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t with an increased risk of non-pelleted faeces (FCS≥3.0) for both flocks. Cryptosporidium-27 positive lambs were 2.8-11.6 times more likely to have non-pelleted faeces and Giardia 28 positive lambs were 2.4-14.0 times more likely to have non-pelleted faeces compared to 29 lambs negative for each respective parasite. Lambs positive for both Cryptosporidium and 30 Giardia were 2.9-11.8 times more likely to have non-pelleted faeces than lambs positive 31 for only one or neither of these parasites. Mixed internal parasite infections were found to 32 have greater impacts on FCS and BCS than single infections. A higher number of internal 33 parasites detected per lamb was associated with lower BCS and more loose faeces. The 34 relationship between parasite detection and live weight or growth rate were inconsistent for 35 both flocks. Adjusted WEC was correlated with FCS and faecal DM% for one flock only, 36 although little or no correlation was found with live weight and growth rate for both flocks. 37Cryptosporidium ubiquitum and C. parvum were the most prevalent Cryptosporidium 38Page 3 of 39 A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t Page 3 of 3 species isolated in the two flocks. Giardia assemblage E was the most commonly isolated 39 genotype assemblage from both flocks, while assemblage A was isolated almost as 40 frequently as assemblage E in the one flock. One flock was a potential source of zoonotic 41Cryptosporidium and the other flock was a potential source of zoonotic Giardia. 42