2017
DOI: 10.1080/14659891.2017.1378737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between energy drink consumption and alcohol use among college students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The included articles were published between 2007 and 2021 and were performed in several countries: 27 of them were conducted in the USA, [16,17,21,36,40,42,49,52,55,58,59,60,64,69,71,73,75,76,80,82,84,88,93,95,97,99], 8 in Saudi Arabia, [33-35, 37-39, 77, 85], 6 in Turkey, [20,41,42,44,45,96], 5…”
Section: Nr = Not Reportedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The included articles were published between 2007 and 2021 and were performed in several countries: 27 of them were conducted in the USA, [16,17,21,36,40,42,49,52,55,58,59,60,64,69,71,73,75,76,80,82,84,88,93,95,97,99], 8 in Saudi Arabia, [33-35, 37-39, 77, 85], 6 in Turkey, [20,41,42,44,45,96], 5…”
Section: Nr = Not Reportedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the studies included male and female subjects with a range of 18–34 years; the sample size ranged from 72 [ 56 ] to 10,340 individuals [ 60 ]. The evaluation of ED consumption frequency is based mainly on a monthly report [ 26 , 30 , 33 , 35 , 38 , 39 , 41 , 45 , 49 , 50 , 52 , 54 , 55 , 59 , 61 , 63 ], less commonly on a yearly report [ 29 , 34 , 37 , 42 , 53 , 60 , 62 , 64 ] and on a weekly report in only two studies [ 23 , 54 ]. Thirteen articles analyzed AmED consumption in comparison with the consumption of alcohol alone [ 24 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 41 , 43 , 45 , 46 , 53 ] while four articles compared the AmED consumption with EDs only [ 28 , 29 , 42 , 44 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the quality assessment, a total of 25 articles showed a poor quality rating, which means with important limitations that could invalidate the results and high risk of bias in general [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 31 , 34 , 36 , 38 , 40 , 41 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 ]. A total of 15 assessed studies reported a fair quality rating, with no known important limitation that could invalidate the results and with a moderate or acceptable risk of bias [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 35 , 37 , 42 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 58 , 61 ] and only two studies reported a good quality rating with all criteria met and a very low risk of bias [ 32 , 33 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations