2023
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1144564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between computed tomography markers of cerebral small vessel disease and hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients

Abstract: BackgroundHemorrhagic transformation (HT) is common among acute ischemic stroke patients after treatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). We analyzed potential relationships between markers of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) and HT in patients after IVT.MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed computed tomography (CT) data for acute ischemic stroke patients before and after treatment with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator at a large Chinese hospital between July 2014 and June 2021. Total CSVD… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies were considered eligible for the systematic review and meta‐analysis if they met the following criteria: (1) full‐length publication in a peer‐reviewed journal, (2) included participants aged ≥18 years who had brain imaging for detection of cSVD by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and (3) reported markers of cSVD compared against a valid, quantified measure of cerebrovascular reactivity, cerebrovascular autoregulation, or arterial stiffness. Although previous reports have assessed cSVD burden using computed tomography (CT) 22 , 23 , 24 and have noted good agreement between CT‐ and MRI‐derived cSVD features, the features detected on CT are limited to only a couple of the full range of markers recommended for quantification by guidelines. 4 , 25 Research standards currently recommend MRI due to the higher sensitivity and specificity for determining cSVD load, 4 and therefore, the present review and meta‐analyses exclude studies using only CT. Studies including populations with a previous stroke or other cerebrovascular event (eg, prior transient ischemic attack, intracranial arterial stenosis) were eligible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies were considered eligible for the systematic review and meta‐analysis if they met the following criteria: (1) full‐length publication in a peer‐reviewed journal, (2) included participants aged ≥18 years who had brain imaging for detection of cSVD by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and (3) reported markers of cSVD compared against a valid, quantified measure of cerebrovascular reactivity, cerebrovascular autoregulation, or arterial stiffness. Although previous reports have assessed cSVD burden using computed tomography (CT) 22 , 23 , 24 and have noted good agreement between CT‐ and MRI‐derived cSVD features, the features detected on CT are limited to only a couple of the full range of markers recommended for quantification by guidelines. 4 , 25 Research standards currently recommend MRI due to the higher sensitivity and specificity for determining cSVD load, 4 and therefore, the present review and meta‐analyses exclude studies using only CT. Studies including populations with a previous stroke or other cerebrovascular event (eg, prior transient ischemic attack, intracranial arterial stenosis) were eligible.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%