2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00248-010-9736-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations Between Coinfection Prevalence of Borrelia lusitaniae, Anaplasma sp., and Rickettsia sp. in Hard Ticks Feeding on Reptile Hosts

Abstract: An increasing number of studies reveal that ticks and their hosts are infected with multiple pathogens, suggesting that coinfection might be frequent for both vectors and wild reservoir hosts. Whereas the examination of associations between coinfecting pathogen agents in natural host-vector-pathogen systems is a prerequisite for a better understanding of disease maintenance and transmission, the associations between pathogens within vectors or hosts are seldom explicitly examined. We examined the prevalence of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified R. helvetica, R. monacensis and R. hoogstraalii, which are added to R. slovaca and R. raoultii, the two other species that have a natural focus of transmission in our study area, associated to D. marginatus [30]. We detected R. helvetica in few attached I. ricinus larvae, as previously reported in studies on lizards in mountain areas of the Iberian Peninsula [21] and Slovakia [56], Madeira island [7] and the Netherlands [55]. The fact that R. helvetica was also identified in a tail tissue and that we observed ticks exclusively feeding in the axillary region indicates a disseminated infection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We identified R. helvetica, R. monacensis and R. hoogstraalii, which are added to R. slovaca and R. raoultii, the two other species that have a natural focus of transmission in our study area, associated to D. marginatus [30]. We detected R. helvetica in few attached I. ricinus larvae, as previously reported in studies on lizards in mountain areas of the Iberian Peninsula [21] and Slovakia [56], Madeira island [7] and the Netherlands [55]. The fact that R. helvetica was also identified in a tail tissue and that we observed ticks exclusively feeding in the axillary region indicates a disseminated infection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Likewise, lizards on do not appear to be attractive hosts for D. marginatus immatures, although we abundantly collected this tick species by dragging and on small rodents [30,31,40]. This may be due to its nidicolous habits, that make immatures preferentially live in small rodents nests; nevertheless, D. marginatus was reported to infest lizards by other authors [56]. 95%CI for I. ricinus larvae were calculated using GEE with repeated measures; exact binomial 95%CI are given for I. ricinus and H. sulcata nymphs B. burgdorferi infection prevalence in attached nymphs, and the heterogeneity of genospecies, mirrors previous findings in questing ticks in the area [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Slovakia, R. helvetica was identified by molecular biology in I. ricinus ticks [adults captured from vegetation , collected from free-living green lizards (Vaclav et al, 2011), or nymphs picked from P. modularis birds (Spitalska et al, 2011)], and in roe deer . Human cases were confirmed (Sekeyova et al, 2012c), and the first isolation of R. helvetica yield from ticks collected in Slovakia has recently been provided (Sekeyova et al, 2012b).…”
Section: Rickettsia Helveticamentioning
confidence: 99%