2020
DOI: 10.1332/239788220x15833754379590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between care network types and psychological well-being among Dutch older adults

Abstract: This study examines the mechanisms underlying the association between care network types and psychological well-being. Care recipients in the 2015/16 wave of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (N = 607) reported on the structural (size and composition) and functional features of care network types (satisfaction, feeling in control of care and care attitudes). Those in a mixed care network reported the highest depressive symptoms, while those in a spousal care network and a privately paid care network repo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 2 below, for the participants in our studies in Australia and the United States, attending appointments alone increased the emotional burden on the patient (patients were "petrified" and "lonely") and made the appointments less effective for conveying important information as patients noted they were too "overwhelmed" to absorb information or ask important questions. This, of course, speaks to enduring concerns around the (often undervalued) practical and emotional caregiving performed by friends and families of people living with cancer (31,42,43). Caregivers themselves felt powerless to help from outside the hospital and, furthermore, health professionals carried an increased emotional load when discussing care and difficult prognoses without anyone to provide the necessary emotional support to the patient.…”
Section: The Impact Of Pandemic Living On Network Of Carementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Table 2 below, for the participants in our studies in Australia and the United States, attending appointments alone increased the emotional burden on the patient (patients were "petrified" and "lonely") and made the appointments less effective for conveying important information as patients noted they were too "overwhelmed" to absorb information or ask important questions. This, of course, speaks to enduring concerns around the (often undervalued) practical and emotional caregiving performed by friends and families of people living with cancer (31,42,43). Caregivers themselves felt powerless to help from outside the hospital and, furthermore, health professionals carried an increased emotional load when discussing care and difficult prognoses without anyone to provide the necessary emotional support to the patient.…”
Section: The Impact Of Pandemic Living On Network Of Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of the secondthe undulations of informal caresocial science scholarship has routinely pointed to the interdependencies between formalized and informal sectors, both in cancer care and beyond [see, for example, literature on reliance on informal care and mixed-care networks (28), including family and non-kin caregivers (29) in the contexts of ill health (30) and/or aging (31)]. This work has also emphasized the opaqueness of reliance on informal caring networks, and what their role is in survivorship (32).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of dissatisfaction, they can turn to another care provider without excessive administrative procedures. This provides LTC recipients with more control over the care arrangement, which might be one of the reasons for the higher psychological wellbeing among recipients of privately paid care (Broese van Groenou, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…worrying, sleeplessness) and are often prevalent in LTC recipients (Pot et al., 2005). However, having unmet care needs (Pepin et al., 2017) and receiving insufficient care (Broese van Groenou, 2020) can be similarly detrimental to one's PWB, which highlights the importance of the subjective evaluation of LTC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%