OBJECTIVE -To examine the association between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and determine the optimal cutoff in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients in Taiwan.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -Serum Lp(a) was determined in 557 type 2 diabetic patients (243 men and 314 women) recruited consecutively from a diabetes clinic at the National Taiwan University Hospital. Ankle-brachial index (ABI) Ͻ0.9 was diagnosed as PAD (n ϭ 45) and Ͻ0.8 as severe PAD (n ϭ 20). Potential confounders included age, sex, BMI, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), diabetes duration, insulin usage, smoking, hypertension, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), total cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL and LDL cholesterol.RESULTS -The distribution of Lp(a) was right skewed and no significant differences for sex, WHR, insulin usage, smoking, hypertension, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were observed. In men, log[Lp(a)] was correlated positively with age, duration, and total and LDL cholesterol (borderline significant, P Ͻ 0.1) and negatively with BMI, triglycerides, and FPG (P Ͻ 0.1). In women, log[Lp(a)] was correlated positively with total and LDL cholesterol and negatively with triglycerides and BMI (P Ͻ 0.1). ABI was significantly correlated with log[Lp(a)], especially in men or in patients with PAD. The optimal cutoff determined by discriminant analysis was 13.3 mg/dl. Patients with Lp(a) above this value had a 2.7-fold higher risk of PAD after multivariate adjustment. Lp(a) also significantly increased from no PAD to mild and severe PAD (17.1 Ϯ 14.4, 23.7 Ϯ 20.3, and 36.9 Ϯ 22.8 mg/dl, respectively, P Ͻ 0.001).CONCLUSIONS -Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for PAD in type 2 diabetic patients in Taiwan. The optimal cutoff is 13.3 mg/dl.
Diabetes Care 27:517-521, 2004L ipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a heterogeneous macromolecule consisting of a glycoprotein apolipoprotein(a), which is disulfide-linked to apolipoprotein B-100 on an LDL core (1). Apolipoprotein(a) exhibits size polymorphism, which is closely linked to Lp(a) density and concentrations (2). The limited distribution of Lp(a) in a few animal species implies that it is not essential in lipoprotein metabolism (3). However, it is clinically important because its concentrations are primarily genetically determined, associated with atherosclerotic disease, and less affected by lifestyle or medication (4). Lp(a) concentrations are quite constant in an individual (2). Lipid-lowering statins appear ineffective, whereas niacin might have some effect on Lp(a) lowering (5). Lp(a) might be higher in type 2 diabetic patients, but glycemic control seems to have no effect on serum Lp(a) (6). With few exceptions (7,8), Lp(a) has been shown to be a risk factor for atherosclerotic disease, such as ischemic heart disease (9,10), myocardial infarction (11,12), stroke (13), and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (14,15).A community study in Taiwan examining the relationship between Lp(a) and socioeconomic and atherosclerotic risk factors demonstrated ...