2007
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association studies for untyped markers with TUNA

Abstract: The software package is available for download from the website: http://www.stat.uchicago.edu/~wen/tuna/.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several methods have been proposed previously for multilocus association in which information from untyped markers has been shown to be useful in inferring or imputing the missing genotypes [Browning, 2008; Marchini et al, 2007; Nicolae, 2006; Wen and Nicolae, 2008]. However, these methods require the complete genotype for each individual in order to infer the genotype of the missing marker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several methods have been proposed previously for multilocus association in which information from untyped markers has been shown to be useful in inferring or imputing the missing genotypes [Browning, 2008; Marchini et al, 2007; Nicolae, 2006; Wen and Nicolae, 2008]. However, these methods require the complete genotype for each individual in order to infer the genotype of the missing marker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This structure, i.e. the degree of linkage disequilibrium (LD) [Devlin and Risch, 1995; Guo, 1997; Pritchard and Przeworski, 2001] between various polymorphisms, has been shown to be very useful in genetic association studies [Gu et al, 2008; Marchini et al, 2007; Wen and Nicolae, 2008; Zaitlen et al, 2007].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach for untyped variation (TUNA) is described elsewhere (Nicolae, 2006; Wen and Nicolae, 2008), and relies on estimates of joint haplotype frequencies for both typed and untyped markers in order to perform tests of association for the untyped markers. The frequencies are used to build linear combinations of observed haplotype frequencies that are used as proxies for untyped alleles.…”
Section: Untyped Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods for imputation generally take similar approaches, relying on LD relationships between SNPs in the HapMap, and are relatively computer intensive. Popular imputation programs include MACH29, IMPUTE30, PLINK27, BEAGLE31, BimBam32 and TUNA33. Application of these programs to most genome-wide genotyping datasets currently results in estimates for more than 2 million SNPs, increasing genomic coverage and allowing groups with distinct starting genotyping platforms to compare results or conduct meta-analysis.…”
Section: Software For the Conduct And Interpretation Of Genetic Analymentioning
confidence: 99%