2019
DOI: 10.1002/lary.28277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of voice and mental health diagnoses with differences in voice‐related care utilization

Abstract: Objective: To compare healthcare utilization in voice patients with versus without mental health (MH) diagnoses Study Design: Retrospective study using electronic medical records from large regional healthcare system. Methods: We examined data on sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, voice-related diagnoses, and patterns of healthcare utilization (including medication use, tests and procedures, and outpatient visits). The study period spanned January 2005 through June 2017.Results: A total of 24,672… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We examined psychosocial distress as an outcome variable given the transdiagnostic recognition of distress among patients across multiple otolaryngologic areas. [14][15][16][17][18][19] In addition, although the study included a variety of voice diagnoses and all patients were new to the academic tertiary care voice clinic, there may have been variable degrees of previous knowl-edge about their voice problems and previous treatments that may have affected their responses on the voice-specific scales. Racial and ethnic diversity in the sample was limited, in part reflecting the demographic characteristics of the state, which limits the generalizability of the study's results to other populations.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We examined psychosocial distress as an outcome variable given the transdiagnostic recognition of distress among patients across multiple otolaryngologic areas. [14][15][16][17][18][19] In addition, although the study included a variety of voice diagnoses and all patients were new to the academic tertiary care voice clinic, there may have been variable degrees of previous knowl-edge about their voice problems and previous treatments that may have affected their responses on the voice-specific scales. Racial and ethnic diversity in the sample was limited, in part reflecting the demographic characteristics of the state, which limits the generalizability of the study's results to other populations.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with voice disorders frequently have psychosocial distress (eg, symptoms of depression and anxiety) in addition to physical health concerns. [14][15][16][17][18][19] Assessing psychosocial distress is important given its association with vocal impairment. 20 Although a negative association between communicative participation and depression has been observed in patients with head and neck cancers, 21 the association between communicative participation and psychosocial distress has not been formally assessed in patients with voice disorders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent work, we observed in a large health system that 47% of patients with voice diagnoses also had MH diagnoses, compared to a baseline rate of 14% in the overall health system data repository. Patients who had both MH and voice diagnoses were less likely to see an otolaryngologist, more likely to undergo imaging, and more likely to have nonspecific voice diagnoses compared to patients who had voice diagnoses but no MH diagnoses . Although we noted a high prevalence of MH diagnoses and differences in voice‐related care utilization associated with MH diagnoses, this study neither examined whether the MH diagnoses preceded or followed the voice diagnoses nor compared these groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Patients were identified using voice and MH diagnosis codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐9‐CM) and 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐10‐CM) as previously described (Supporting Table SI). MH diagnosis categories were depression, anxiety, somatoform disorders, and stress‐related/adjustment disorders. Voice‐related diagnosis categories were acute laryngitis, chronic laryngitis, benign neoplasm of the larynx, laryngeal cancer, nonspecific dysphonia, vocal fold paresis/paralysis, laryngeal stenosis, and laryngeal spasm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation