2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12966-021-01081-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of ultra-processed food consumption with cardiovascular mortality in the US population: long-term results from a large prospective multicenter study

Abstract: Background Ultra-processed foods have now become dominant in the global food system. Whether their consumption is associated with cardiovascular mortality remains controversial. Moreover, data on ultra-processed foods and cardiovascular outcomes are scarce in the US population. We aimed to examine the association of ultra-processed food consumption with cardiovascular mortality in a US population. Methods A population-based cohort of 91,891 partici… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
76
1
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(77 reference statements)
2
76
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the variability within the same country, Brazil showed levels of UPF consumption ranging from 7.7% in 64 subjects aged 25–57 years [ 57 ] to 51.2% of total energy intake in over 4200 subjects [ 58 ]. A lower variability was identified in studies performed in the United States, with levels of intake ranging from 50% to 70%, with the only exception being a study observing an energy intake of 35.5% in almost 92,000 subjects aged 55–74 years [ 59 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the variability within the same country, Brazil showed levels of UPF consumption ranging from 7.7% in 64 subjects aged 25–57 years [ 57 ] to 51.2% of total energy intake in over 4200 subjects [ 58 ]. A lower variability was identified in studies performed in the United States, with levels of intake ranging from 50% to 70%, with the only exception being a study observing an energy intake of 35.5% in almost 92,000 subjects aged 55–74 years [ 59 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Monteiro et al proposed the NOVA classification to categorize foods based on the degree of processing [4], several studies have been conducted to estimate the level of consumption of UPF and its association with several health markers [24,35,52,67,120] as well as with disease risk and mortality [55,59,87,121,122], adjusting the models for energy intake and other potential confounding factors. It was hypothesized that a high level of UPF consumption may represent a health issue, being associated with weight gain and worsening of cardiovascular risk factors such as high waist circumference and low HDL cholesterol [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growing evidence has accumulated that the consumption of ultra-processed foods has positive associations with metabolic health [7,13,[53][54][55][56][57][58][59] such as obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes, cardiovascular diseases [12,14], cancer [60,61], and mortality [9,62,63]. The adverse impacts of ultra-processed foods on human health have been explained by the poor nutrient profile of these foods [3,17], the low dietary quality [3,4,11,33] associated with the consumption of these foods, and the addictive eating behaviors induced by these foods, which may lead to overconsumption [7,64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Packaged food and beverages are predominantly categorized as ultra-processed or highly processed foods on the basis of the NOVA and/or Poti et al classification systems, and they are generally defined as unhealthy, with less favorable nutrient profiles than less processed foods [ 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ]. The consumption of these packaged ultra-processed foods has been linked to poorer diet quality and numerous adverse health outcomes [ 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]. There is also the potential for chemicals to transfer from plastic food packaging into items of food, which can impact human health via endocrine disruptions [ 49 , 50 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%