2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10528-021-10060-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of TNFRSF1A and IFNLR1 Gene Polymorphisms with the Risk of Developing Breast Cancer and Clinical Pathologic Features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ensuing receptor experiences proteolytic cleavage, thereby releasing its soluble variant capable of interacting with unbound TNF-α, thereby mitigating inflammatory responses. This interaction assumes significance in cellular processes such as survival, apoptosis, and inflammation, as elucidated in prior investigations [49]. Earlier research has underscored the prognostic relevance of the pyroptosis-related gene TNFRSF1A concerning OS patients' survival [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The ensuing receptor experiences proteolytic cleavage, thereby releasing its soluble variant capable of interacting with unbound TNF-α, thereby mitigating inflammatory responses. This interaction assumes significance in cellular processes such as survival, apoptosis, and inflammation, as elucidated in prior investigations [49]. Earlier research has underscored the prognostic relevance of the pyroptosis-related gene TNFRSF1A concerning OS patients' survival [43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, the fact a large amount of IFN-l is produced by DCs in response to STING activation warrants further investigation in the realms of cancer immunotherapy. However, as the IFN-l locus has been shown to be polymorphic in a subset of cancer patients and patients suffering from infectious diseases (8,29,65,66), moving forward, polymorphisms and differences in IFN-l gene expression will need to be taken into account when considering clinical STING immunotherapeutic approaches (29,35,67,68).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%