2018
DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Time-Varying Rest-Activity Rhythm With Survival in Older Adults With Lung Cancer

Abstract: Background To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the relationship of rest-activity rhythm with survival in older adults with lung cancer and to consider variations in rest-activity rhythm over time. Objective The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between rest-activity rhythm variations and survival in 33 older adults with lung cancer by considering rest-activity rhythm as a time-dependent covariate over time. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, progression-free survival and overall survival were significantly improved in metastatic colorectal cancer patients whose I < O exceeded 97.5% 14 . This finding has been confirmed in other oncological clinical settings 36 , 37 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Indeed, progression-free survival and overall survival were significantly improved in metastatic colorectal cancer patients whose I < O exceeded 97.5% 14 . This finding has been confirmed in other oncological clinical settings 36 , 37 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Indeed, progression-free survival and overall survival were significantly improved in metastatic colorectal cancer patients whose I<O exceeded 97.5% [14]. This finding has been confirmed in other oncological clinical settings [45,46].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…A total of 13 different cancer diagnoses were represented in the 26 studies. The most frequently investigated cancers were colorectal cancer reported in six studies ( Mormont et al, 2000 ; Maisey et al, 2002 ; Innominato et al, 2009 , 2012 , 2015 ; LĂ©vi et al, 2014 ), non-small cell lung cancer in six studies ( Naughton et al, 2002 ; Braun et al, 2011 ; Zhao et al, 2013 ; Chang and Lin, 2014 ; Gottfried et al, 2020 ; Kuo et al, 2020 ), and breast cancer in five studies ( Geels et al, 2000 ; Kramer et al, 2000 ; Zhao et al, 2013 ; Chang and Lin, 2014 ; Palesh et al, 2014 ). In four studies, the sample consisted of mixed cancer populations ( Zhao et al, 2013 ; Chang and Lin, 2014 ; Collins et al, 2017 ; Chandra et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…g Sensitivity analysis, including only studies based on the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. h Sensitivity analysis omitting Kuo et al (2020) , an outlier with a HR (5.57) approaching (93%) two standard deviations from the pooled HR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%