2019
DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.0425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Time From Primary Diagnosis to First Distant Relapse of Metastatic Melanoma With Progression of Disease and Survival

Abstract: The prognosis of advanced melanoma has been greatly improved by new therapeutic agents and clinicians rely on dynamic signals to drive their therapeutic choices. Although the kinetics of metastatic disease seem to be correlated with survival, progression of the localized disease is not predictable. OBJECTIVE To assess whether progression of metastatic disease is associated with the time to the first distant recurrence of melanoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This study was conducted from March 1, 2013, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly however, in the recent study by Faries et al 4 of the end results of the MMAIT randomized trial of metastatectomy with or without immune therapy for stage IV melanoma, with fairly broad inclusion criteria (resection of up to 5 metastatic sites), not only did the authors report a 5-year OS rate of around 40% after resection, in multivariable analysis, the time from primary diagnosis to randomization was not prognostic. This would seem to be consistent with the observations of Vallet et al 3 There is another potential explanation for the observations of Vallet et al 3 in this very contemporary cohort of patients with stage IV disease, one that most melanoma oncologists would prefer to embrace. In sharp contrast to bygone times, we now have therapy that can actually alter the kinetics of metastatic melanoma.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly however, in the recent study by Faries et al 4 of the end results of the MMAIT randomized trial of metastatectomy with or without immune therapy for stage IV melanoma, with fairly broad inclusion criteria (resection of up to 5 metastatic sites), not only did the authors report a 5-year OS rate of around 40% after resection, in multivariable analysis, the time from primary diagnosis to randomization was not prognostic. This would seem to be consistent with the observations of Vallet et al 3 There is another potential explanation for the observations of Vallet et al 3 in this very contemporary cohort of patients with stage IV disease, one that most melanoma oncologists would prefer to embrace. In sharp contrast to bygone times, we now have therapy that can actually alter the kinetics of metastatic melanoma.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The second study, from Vallet and colleagues in Paris, 3 focused on the question of whether, in a cohort of patients with established distant recurrence after treatment of a known antecedent primary melanoma, the time from initial primary excision to the first distant recurrence was associated with progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival (although not explicitly stated, these are assumed to be postrecurrence PFS and OS). The investigators queried MelBase, a multicenter collaborative French database of patients with unresectable stage III and stage IV melanoma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 2% of patients with melanoma present with regional or distant metastasis as the first manifestation of the disease without a known primary melanoma [ 10 ]. These patients represent about 10–15% of all patients with hematogenously spread melanoma at any timepoint during their disease course [ 94 , 95 ]. Immunohistochemical markers used for diagnostic purposes of melanoma, e.g., HMB45 (gp100), tyrosinase, and Melan-A, are also often expressed in OcM and, thus, not able to distinguish between the different melanoma subtypes.…”
Section: Genetic Biomarkers When Metastatic Disease Is Presentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 16 , 18 , 19 Median time to recurrence and distant metastasis have been reported at 1.9 years and 2.1 years, respectively, indicating that the median follow-up time of 3.2 years in this study is sufficient to detect the majority of expected events. 28 , 29 Class 2 patients have a 3-year survival rate of 81%, which is lower than 5-year melanoma-specific survival for stage IIB-IIC patients (87% and 82%, respectively) for which AJCC 8th ed recommends increased imaging surveillance. These data suggest that class 2 patients may benefit from increased surveillance management for early detection of recurrence and metastasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%