2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Systemic Inflammation Score With Atrial Fibrillation: A Case-Control Study With Propensity Score Matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, uncontrolled inflammation constitutes a positive feedback loop that can lead to numerous unintended diseases (20). There is considerable evidence to support a direct relationship between inflammation and AF (31). For example, new-onset AF has been observed frequently in the critically ill or in patients with sepsis (32,33).…”
Section: Evidence Of a Relationship Between Systemic Inflammation And Afmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, uncontrolled inflammation constitutes a positive feedback loop that can lead to numerous unintended diseases (20). There is considerable evidence to support a direct relationship between inflammation and AF (31). For example, new-onset AF has been observed frequently in the critically ill or in patients with sepsis (32,33).…”
Section: Evidence Of a Relationship Between Systemic Inflammation And Afmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 In other medical diseases, such atrial fibrillation, a previous study also demonstrated that patients with higher SIS had a significantly higher risk of atrial fibrillation and SIS was further correlated with atrial diameter. 28 In the current study, patients with OSCC who had a higher SIS were also associated with many other poor clinicopathological factors such as older age, advanced tumor status, tumor depth, advanced overall pathologic stage, extranodal extension, and perineural invasion; in additional multivariate analyses, SIS was shown to be an independent factor and could be used to predict prognosis better.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…As shown in Table 2, Bacteroidales and Firmicutes seemed to display an association with NCCL risk, although the association was not statistically significant ( Bacteroidales, P = 0.056; Firmicutes, P = 0.066), while Actinomycetales , Clostridiales and Fusobacteriales exhibited statistically significant differences (Actinomycetales, P = 0.023; Clostridiales, P = 0.011). Among these, Fusobacteriales showed an extremely significant difference ( P = 0.000345, t = 3.932) between the normal group and the NCCL group 23 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Among these, Fusobacteriales showed an extremely significant difference (P = 0.000345, t = 3.932) between the normal group and the NCCL group. 23…”
Section: Paired T Test Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%