Abstract:IMPORTANCE Supine maternal position in the third trimester is associated with reduced uterine blood flow and increased risk of late stillbirth. As reduced uterine blood flow is also associated with fetal growth restriction, this study explored the association between the position in which pregnant women went to sleep and infant birth weight. OBJECTIVE To examine the association between supine position when going to sleep in women after 28 weeks of pregnancy and lower birth weight and birth weight centiles. DES… Show more
“…We lack information but cannot exclude that some women may have embraced the idea of lying down of their left side frequently and that this lying position may have enhanced fetal growth. [35][36][37] A meta-analysis 38 showed an association between supine position and reduced birthweight. If women practising Mindfetalness more often lie on their side, this may explain the lower rate of babies born small-for-gestational-age in the Mindfetalness group.…”
Objective To examine whether a method for raising women's awareness of fetal movements, Mindfetalness, can affect pregnancy outcomes.Design Cluster-randomised controlled trial.Setting Sixty-seven maternity clinics in Stockholm, Sweden.Population Women with singleton pregnancy with birth from 32 weeks' gestation.Methods Women registered at a clinic randomised to Mindfetalness were assigned to receive a leaflet about Mindfetalness (n = 19 639) in comparison with routine care (n = 20 226). Data were collected from a population-based register.Main outcome measures Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes after birth, visit to healthcare due to decrease in fetal movements. Other outcomes: Apgar score <4 at 5 minutes after birth, small-forgestational-age and mode of delivery.Results No difference (1.1 versus 1.1%, relative risk [RR] 1.0; 95% CI 0.8-1.2) was found between the Mindfetalness group and the Routine care group for a 5-minute Apgar score <7. Women in the Mindfetalness group contacted healthcare more often due to decreased fetal movements (6.6 versus 3.8%, RR 1.72; 95% CI 1.57-1.87). Mindfetalness was associated with a reduction of babies born small-for-gestational-age (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90-1.00), babies born after gestational week 41 +6 (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.98) and caesarean sections (19.0 versus 20.0%, RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.91-0.99).Conclusions Mindfetalness did not reduce the number of babies born with an Apgar score <7. However, Mindfetalness was associated with the health benefits of decreased incidence of caesarean section and fewer children born small-for-gestational-age.
“…We lack information but cannot exclude that some women may have embraced the idea of lying down of their left side frequently and that this lying position may have enhanced fetal growth. [35][36][37] A meta-analysis 38 showed an association between supine position and reduced birthweight. If women practising Mindfetalness more often lie on their side, this may explain the lower rate of babies born small-for-gestational-age in the Mindfetalness group.…”
Objective To examine whether a method for raising women's awareness of fetal movements, Mindfetalness, can affect pregnancy outcomes.Design Cluster-randomised controlled trial.Setting Sixty-seven maternity clinics in Stockholm, Sweden.Population Women with singleton pregnancy with birth from 32 weeks' gestation.Methods Women registered at a clinic randomised to Mindfetalness were assigned to receive a leaflet about Mindfetalness (n = 19 639) in comparison with routine care (n = 20 226). Data were collected from a population-based register.Main outcome measures Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes after birth, visit to healthcare due to decrease in fetal movements. Other outcomes: Apgar score <4 at 5 minutes after birth, small-forgestational-age and mode of delivery.Results No difference (1.1 versus 1.1%, relative risk [RR] 1.0; 95% CI 0.8-1.2) was found between the Mindfetalness group and the Routine care group for a 5-minute Apgar score <7. Women in the Mindfetalness group contacted healthcare more often due to decreased fetal movements (6.6 versus 3.8%, RR 1.72; 95% CI 1.57-1.87). Mindfetalness was associated with a reduction of babies born small-for-gestational-age (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90-1.00), babies born after gestational week 41 +6 (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.98) and caesarean sections (19.0 versus 20.0%, RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.91-0.99).Conclusions Mindfetalness did not reduce the number of babies born with an Apgar score <7. However, Mindfetalness was associated with the health benefits of decreased incidence of caesarean section and fewer children born small-for-gestational-age.
“…Despite the women in this study spending a quarter of the night in the supine position, we were surprised to find that supine sleep position was not temporally associated with adverse FHR changes, for neither healthy nor complicated pregnancies. Relationships have been reported between self-reported supine 'sleep onset' during the later stages of pregnancy and fetal wellbeing, including reduced birthweight, fetal cerebral redistribution and stillbirth (Anderson et al 2019;Cronin et al 2019;Robertson et al 2020). There is biological plausibility for the supine position causing detrimental effects including aorto-caval compression resulting in decreased cardiac output (Humphries et al 2019) and impaired utero-placental blood flow (Jeffreys et al 2006).…”
Hospital for Women. She recently completed her PhD looking at the prevalence and impact of sleep-disordered breathing in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and aspires to extend her research programme into sleep behaviours and sleep disorders during pregnancy and the role they play in maternal and fetal wellbeing.
“…Women who read the leaflet might have therefore adopted this position when going to sleep, rather than a supine position. Researchers have found an association between supine sleep position and reduced birthweight and even stillbirth [17,18].…”
Background
Maternal perception of decreased fetal movements is commonly used to assess fetal well-being. However, there are different opinions on whether healthcare professionals should encourage maternal observation of fetal movements, as researchers claim that raising awareness increases unnecessary interventions, without improving perinatal health. We aimed to investigate whether cesarean sections and labor induction increase by raising women’s awareness of fetal movements through Mindfetalness. Further, we aimed to study perinatal health after implementing Mindfetalness in maternity care.
Methods
In a cluster randomized controlled trial, 67 maternity clinics were allocated to Mindfetalness or routine care. In the Mindfetalness group, midwives distributed a leaflet telling the women to focus on the character, strength and frequency of the fetal movements without counting each movement. The instruction was to do so for 15 min daily when the fetus was awake, from gestational week 28 until birth. In this sub-group analysis, we targeted women born in Sweden giving birth from 32 weeks’ gestation. We applied the intention-to-treat principle.
Results
The Mindfetalness group included 13,029 women and the Routine-care group 13,456 women. Women randomized to Mindfetalness had less cesarean sections (18.4% vs. 20.0%, RR 0.92, CI 0.87–0.97) and labor inductions (19.2% vs. 20.3%, RR 0.95, CI 0.90–0.99) compared to the women in the Routine-care group. Less babies were born small for gestational age (8.5% vs. 9.3%, RR 0.91, CI 0.85–0.99) in the Mindfetalness group. Women in the Mindfetalness group contacted healthcare due to decreased fetal movements to a higher extent than women in the Routine care group (7.8% vs. 4.3%, RR 1.79, CI 1.62–1.97). The differences remain after adjustment for potential confounders.
Conclusions
Raising awareness about fetal movements through Mindfetalness decreased the rate of cesarean sections, labor inductions and small-for-gestational age babies.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02865759). Registered 12 August 2016, www.clinicaltrials.gov.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.