Abstract:Background. Saliva, as a complex biofluid, plays a pivotal role in maintaining oral health and tooth integrity. There has been inconsistent data available on the relationship between salivary parameters and oral health. This study aims to investigate the association between salivary statherin, acidic proline-rich proteins (aPRP), and calcium with oral hygiene status. Methods. One hundred and eighty-eight healthy subjects aged between 18 and 50 years with varying oral hygiene status who gave consent to particip… Show more
“…Four included studies were conducted in India [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ], three studies in Poland [ 19 , 20 , 21 ], two in Brazil [ 22 , 23 ] and one multinational [ 24 ]. Each of the remaining seven studies were performed in China [ 25 ], Kosovo [ 26 ], Chile [ 27 ], Romania [ 28 ], Colombia [ 29 ], Egypt [ 30 ], Malaysia [ 31 ] and Iraq [ 32 ]. All the included studies were conducted within the last 12 years, but the majority were conducted between 2015 and 2021.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The articles also presented a significant collective sample size. A total of 1454 participants, of both adults and children of both genders, were recruited in the 18 included studies, with the least sample size reported for a single study being 24 participants [ 29 ] and the largest being 188 participants [ 31 ]. Nevertheless, of the full sample size, 936 were minors aged between 2 years and 18 years which was reported in 11 of the included sources.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two included studies, contradictory results were also observed for the zinc marker [ 17 , 26 ]. However, for proteinase 3 (PR3) [ 25 ], statherin [ 29 , 31 ] and LL-37 [ 15 ], a significant negative correlation between the molecules and dental caries was evident since high concentration levels were witnessed in caries-free or low caries risk participants, implying that they significantly reduced caries incidences in the caries-free groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the saliva types sampled from the study population, nine included records evaluated unstimulated saliva [ 16 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 29 ], two studies evaluated the stimulated saliva [ 31 , 32 ], three studies evaluated whole saliva [ 15 , 22 , 23 ] and the remaining four studies assessed both whole unstimulated and stimulated saliva [ 17 , 24 , 26 , 30 ]. The saliva samples were collected mainly in the morning and afternoon hours (between 8.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m.) for 12 studies; however, six included studies failed to state the time ranges of saliva sample collection from the participants [ 18 , 21 , 22 , 28 , 30 , 32 ].…”
Saliva plays a significant role in oral health and tooth integrity. Salivary components reduce tooth surface exposure to demineralization, protect against teeth wear and aid in enamel remineralization. There is a growing attempt to use salivary markers in diagnosing or predicting caries. However, despite the current information, there has yet to be an agreement among scholars. This study seeks to contribute more evidence on the suitability of salivary biomarkers in dental caries diagnosis. Eligible studies were electronically searched on online databases PubMed, Elsevier’s Scopus, EMBASE and Web of Science, and all the studies that met the inclusion criteria were considered. The PECOS criteria guided the study selection process based on the study question. The risk of bias was assessed using the STROBE checklist. Eighteen articles were included in the analysis. All the studies presented relevant data concerning the study objectives. There was evidence of associations between salivary biomarkers and dental caries, and the correlations were either positive or negative. The studies presented significant heterogeneity; thus, a meta-analysis was not possible. Salivary biomarkers appeared to perform crucial and complementary functions toward tooth integrity and thus may be reliable in predicting or diagnosing dental caries in patients.
“…Four included studies were conducted in India [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ], three studies in Poland [ 19 , 20 , 21 ], two in Brazil [ 22 , 23 ] and one multinational [ 24 ]. Each of the remaining seven studies were performed in China [ 25 ], Kosovo [ 26 ], Chile [ 27 ], Romania [ 28 ], Colombia [ 29 ], Egypt [ 30 ], Malaysia [ 31 ] and Iraq [ 32 ]. All the included studies were conducted within the last 12 years, but the majority were conducted between 2015 and 2021.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The articles also presented a significant collective sample size. A total of 1454 participants, of both adults and children of both genders, were recruited in the 18 included studies, with the least sample size reported for a single study being 24 participants [ 29 ] and the largest being 188 participants [ 31 ]. Nevertheless, of the full sample size, 936 were minors aged between 2 years and 18 years which was reported in 11 of the included sources.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two included studies, contradictory results were also observed for the zinc marker [ 17 , 26 ]. However, for proteinase 3 (PR3) [ 25 ], statherin [ 29 , 31 ] and LL-37 [ 15 ], a significant negative correlation between the molecules and dental caries was evident since high concentration levels were witnessed in caries-free or low caries risk participants, implying that they significantly reduced caries incidences in the caries-free groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the saliva types sampled from the study population, nine included records evaluated unstimulated saliva [ 16 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 25 , 27 , 28 , 29 ], two studies evaluated the stimulated saliva [ 31 , 32 ], three studies evaluated whole saliva [ 15 , 22 , 23 ] and the remaining four studies assessed both whole unstimulated and stimulated saliva [ 17 , 24 , 26 , 30 ]. The saliva samples were collected mainly in the morning and afternoon hours (between 8.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m.) for 12 studies; however, six included studies failed to state the time ranges of saliva sample collection from the participants [ 18 , 21 , 22 , 28 , 30 , 32 ].…”
Saliva plays a significant role in oral health and tooth integrity. Salivary components reduce tooth surface exposure to demineralization, protect against teeth wear and aid in enamel remineralization. There is a growing attempt to use salivary markers in diagnosing or predicting caries. However, despite the current information, there has yet to be an agreement among scholars. This study seeks to contribute more evidence on the suitability of salivary biomarkers in dental caries diagnosis. Eligible studies were electronically searched on online databases PubMed, Elsevier’s Scopus, EMBASE and Web of Science, and all the studies that met the inclusion criteria were considered. The PECOS criteria guided the study selection process based on the study question. The risk of bias was assessed using the STROBE checklist. Eighteen articles were included in the analysis. All the studies presented relevant data concerning the study objectives. There was evidence of associations between salivary biomarkers and dental caries, and the correlations were either positive or negative. The studies presented significant heterogeneity; thus, a meta-analysis was not possible. Salivary biomarkers appeared to perform crucial and complementary functions toward tooth integrity and thus may be reliable in predicting or diagnosing dental caries in patients.
“…Salivary proteins play an essential role in maintaining a healthy oral environment. Notably, salivary proteins such as basic proline-rich proteins (bPRPs), acidic proline-rich proteins (aPRPs), histatins, cystatins, mucins, statherins, and amylase exhibit antimicrobial and/or antiviral properties and maintain oral lubricity and mineral composition of dental surfaces that collectively form a key cornerstone of oral immunity [ 3 ]. Many of these proteins directly or indirectly inhibit bacterial growth via disruption of their enzymes or manipulate bacterial adhesion mechanisms, therefore, affecting biofilm formation [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Diet and salivary proteins influence the composition of the oral microbiome, and recent data suggest that TAS2R38 bitter taste genetics may also play a role. We investigated the effects of daily exposure to a cranberry polyphenol oral rinse on taste perception, salivary proteins, and oral microbiota. 6-n-Propylthiouracil (PROP) super-tasters (ST, n = 10) and non-tasters (NT, n = 10) rinsed with 30 mL of 0.75 g/L cranberry polyphenol extract (CPE) in spring water, twice daily for 11 days while consuming their habitual diets. The 16S rRNA gene sequencing showed that the NT oral microbiome composition was different than that of STs at baseline (p = 0.012) but not after the intervention (p = 0.525). Principal coordinates analysis using unweighted UniFrac distance showed that CPE modified microbiome composition in NTs (p = 0.023) but not in STs (p = 0.096). The intervention also altered specific salivary protein levels (α-amylase, MUC-5B, and selected S-type Cystatins) with no changes in sensory perception. Correlation networks between oral microbiota, salivary proteins, and sensory ratings showed that the ST microbiome had a more complex relationship with salivary proteins, particularly proline-rich proteins, than that in NTs. These findings show that CPE modulated the oral microbiome of NTs to be similar to that of STs, which could have implications for oral health.
Background
Hyposalivation and xerostomia (dry mouth), are the leading site-effects to treatment of head and neck cancer. Currently, there are no effective therapies to alleviate radiation-induced hyposalivation. Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (AT-MSCs) have shown potential for restoring salivary gland function. However, the mode of action is unknown. The purpose of the present study was therefore to characterize the effect of AT-MSC therapy on the salivary proteome in previously irradiated head and neck cancer patients.
Methods
Whole saliva was collected from patients with radiation-induced salivary gland hypofunction (n = 8) at baseline, and 120 days after AT-MSC treatment, and from healthy controls (n = 10). The salivary proteome was characterized with mass spectrometry based proteomics, and data was compared within the AT-MSC group (baseline versus day 120) and between AT-MSC group and healthy controls. Significance levels between groups were determined by using double-sided t-test, and visualized by means of principal component analysis, volcano plots and cluster analysis.
Results
Here we show that 140 human proteins are significantly differentially expressed in saliva from patients with radiation-induced hypofunction versus healthy controls. AT-MSC treatment induce a significant impact on the salivary proteome, as 99 proteins are differentially expressed at baseline vs. 120 days after treatment. However, AT-MSC treatment does not restore healthy conditions, as 212 proteins are significantly differentially expressed in saliva 120 days after AT-MSCs treatment, as compared to healthy controls.
Conclusion
The results indicate an increase in proteins related to tissue regeneration in AT-MSCs treated patients. Our study demonstrates the impact of AT-MSCs on the salivary proteome, thereby providing insight into the potential mode of action of this novel treatment approach.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.