Background
Echo-derived linear dimensions offer straightforward indices of right ventricular (RV) structure but have not been systematically compared to RV volumes on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR).
Methods
Echo and CMR were interpreted among CAD patients imaged via prospective (90%) or retrospective (10%) registries. For echo, American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) recommended RV dimensions were measured in apical 4-chamber (basal RV width, mid RV width, RV length), parasternal long (proximal RV outflow tract [pRVOT]) and short axis (distal RVOT) views. For CMR, RV end-diastolic (RV-EDV) and end-systolic (RV-ESV) volumes were quantified via border planimetry.
Results
272 patients underwent echo and CMR within a narrow interval (0.4±1.0 days); complete acquisition of all ASE dimensions was feasible in 98%. All echo dimensions differed between patients with and without RV dilation on CMR (p<0.05). Basal RV width (r=0.70), pRVOT width (r=0.68), and RV length (r=0.61) yielded highest correlations with RV-EDV on CMR; end-systolic dimensions yielded similar correlations (r=0.68, 0.66, 0.65 respectively). In multivariable regression, basal RV width (regression coefficient 1.96 per mm [CI 1.22–2.70], p<0.001), RV length (0.97[0.56–1.37], p<0.001) and pRVOT width (2.62 [1.79–3.44], p<0.001) were independently associated with CMR RV-EDV[r= 0.80]. RV-ESV was similarly associated with echo dimensions (basal RV width; 1.59 per mm [CI 1.06–2.13], p<0.001) | RV length; 1.00 [0.66–1.34], p<0.001) | pRVOT width; 1.80 [1.22–2.39], p<0.001) [r= 0.79].
Conclusions
RV linear dimensions provide readily obtainable markers of RV chamber size. Proximal RVOT and basal width are independently associated with CMR volumes, supporting use of multiple linear dimensions when assessing RV size on echo.