2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2023.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Right Ventricular Functional Parameters With Adverse Cardiopulmonary Outcomes: A Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our group has recently performed a meta-analysis in which we sought to compare the prognostic power of RV EF to conventional echocardiographic parameters (TAPSE, FWLS, FAC). We found that 1 SD reduction in RV EF was robustly associated with adverse cardiopulmonary outcomes, and importantly, RV EF had a superior predictive value compared to the other three parameters ( 17 ). Thus, 3DE-derived RV EF seems to be the best parameter among the “standard” echocardiographic metrics of RV function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Our group has recently performed a meta-analysis in which we sought to compare the prognostic power of RV EF to conventional echocardiographic parameters (TAPSE, FWLS, FAC). We found that 1 SD reduction in RV EF was robustly associated with adverse cardiopulmonary outcomes, and importantly, RV EF had a superior predictive value compared to the other three parameters ( 17 ). Thus, 3DE-derived RV EF seems to be the best parameter among the “standard” echocardiographic metrics of RV function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…For example, in a meta-analysis of echocardiographic studies examining RV parameters across a wide range of cardiopulmonary conditions, head-to-head comparisons showed 3-dimensional volumetric RVEF to demonstrate stronger associations with adverse outcomes than other RV functional indices inclusive of RV strain. 14 When examining RVGLS in relation to CMR EF, whereas RVGLS has been shown to be incrementally prognostic to RVEF in some conditions, 14 the independent prognostic role of RVGLS over CMR-derived RVEF has not been shown in others. 15 In this context, it is important to note that RVGLS via feature-tracking CMR is typically derived from a single, standard 4 chamber view tailored for the LV, whereas RVEF is derived volumetrically on CMR incorporating the function of the entire RV.…”
Section: See Article By Barrett Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings raise the question about the role of the evaluation of RV contraction beyond the longitudinal shortening in patients with LV dysfunction, considering that identifying the decrease in other motion components could be useful as early markers or RV dysfunction, follow-up parameters or indicators for treatment escalation. Accordingly, in a meta-analysis of more than 1,900 patients, Sayour et al have elegantly demonstrated that 3D RVEF has a stronger association with adverse cardiopulmonary outcomes than conventional RV functional indices, namely TAPSE, FAC and RV FWS 30 .…”
Section: Evidence About the Clinical Utility Of The Different Compone...mentioning
confidence: 99%