Association of quantitative sensory testing parameters with clinical outcome in patients with lumbar radiculopathy undergoing microdiscectomy

Abstract

Background/Aim: This study aimed to establish the somatosensory profile of patients with lumbar radiculopathy at pre-and post-microdiscectomy and to explore any association between pre-surgical quantitative sensory test (QST) parameters and post-surgical clinical outcomes. Methods: A standardized QST protocol was performed in 53 patients (mean age 38 ± 11 years, 26 females) with unilateral L5/S1 radiculopathy in the main pain area (MPA), affected dermatome and contralateral mirror sites and in age-and gender-,and body site-matched healthy controls. Repeat measures at 3 months included QST, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and numerous other clinical measures; at 12 months, only clinical measures were repeated. A change <30% on the ODI was defined as 'no clinically meaningful improvement'. Results: Patients showed a significant loss of function in their symptomatic leg both in the dermatome (thermal, mechanical, vibration detection p < .002), and MPA (thermal, mechanical, vibration detection, mechanical pain threshold, mechanical pain sensitivity p < .041) and increased cold sensitivity in the MPA (p < .001). Pre-surgical altered QST parameters improved significantly post-surgery in the dermatome (p < .018) in the symptomatic leg and in the MPA (p < .010), except for thermal detection thresholds and cold sensitivity. Clinical outcomes improved at 3 and 12 months (p < .001). Seven patients demonstrated <30% change on the ODI at 12 months. Baseline loss of function in mechanical detection in the MPA was associated with <30% change on the ODI at 12 months (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.09-6.37, p = .032). Conclusion: Microdiscectomy resulted in improvements in affected somatosensory parameters and clinical outcomes. Pre-surgical mechanical detection thresholds may be predictive of clinical outcome. Significance: This study documented quantitative sensory testing (QST) profiles in patients with lumbar radiculopathy in their main pain area (MPA) and dermatome pre-and post-microdiscectomy and explored associations between QST parameters and clinical outcome. Lumbar radiculopathy was associated with loss of function in modalities This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Effectiveness of Epiduroscopy for Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

“…QST can differentiate between cervical radicular pain and nonspecific neck pain 49 . As patients with predominant nerve root adhesions had an increased long‐term benefit from nerve root adhesiolysis, objective measurement of radicular pain and sensory function may be predictive of postsurgery clinical pain outcome 50,51 …”

Sensory Perception in Lumbosacral Radiculopathy with Radicular Pain: Feasibility Study of Multimodal Bedside-Suitable Somatosensory Testing

“…Another four patients showed isolated hypersensitivity to one modality (brush or cold perception), with hyposensitive responses to all other tests. While hypersensitivity phenomena were common in one report with qualitative type testing study [18], some other studies with QST report hypersensitivity as a rare finding [17,19,20]. Some other radiculopathy studies did not record hypersensitivity or included them in the general group of "sensory impairments" [9].…”

“…The current perception threshold testing was evaluated in patients with lumbar radiculopathy before and after epidural steroid injection [27] without correlation in pain intensity changes after the treatment. Later studies with QST showed some potential to predict improvement after epidural steroid injection for sciatica-related pain [28] and in predicting functional status after microdiscectomy in patients with LSR [20]. QST could potentially reveal the treatment implicated mechanism of action of spinal manipulative therapy [29].…”

Qualitative Sensory Testing in Outcome Prediction of Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for Chronic Painful Unilateral Lumbosacral Radiculopathy: Prospective Observational Study

“…Patients with detected hyposensitivity in various modalities represent the largest part (69.4%) of the whole study population, and this corresponds to the findings of the other studies. 9,[15][16][17][18][19] In addition, QualST showed that patients vary in the dysfunction of different axon types. The most common dysfunction was hyposensitivity to tactile static testing (Ab fibers).…”