2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of quality of life measures with afamelanotide treatment in patients with erythropoietic protoporphyria and x-linked protoporphyria: A retrospective cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, real-world data on afamelanotide in the US are lacking. Two studies evaluating the post-marketing experience with afamelanotide in the US demonstrated a positive effect on patients’ well-being, but the sample sizes were small, biochemical data and light sensitivity were not reported, and no comparisons were made between QoL scores [ 11 , 12 ]. US-specific studies are crucial because the phase-three clinical trial of afamelanotide for the protoporphyrias demonstrated different results for US and European patients [ 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, real-world data on afamelanotide in the US are lacking. Two studies evaluating the post-marketing experience with afamelanotide in the US demonstrated a positive effect on patients’ well-being, but the sample sizes were small, biochemical data and light sensitivity were not reported, and no comparisons were made between QoL scores [ 11 , 12 ]. US-specific studies are crucial because the phase-three clinical trial of afamelanotide for the protoporphyrias demonstrated different results for US and European patients [ 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One EPP-specific measure referred to as the “EPP-QoL” was specifically developed for use in clinical trials with afamelanotide to assess long-term effects of treatment. 15 , 16 , 21 , 22 However, the “EPP-QoL” was developed without patient input as is recommended by current standards and regulatory guidance, 23 , 24 and it lacks a robust assessment of well-being. 25 Validation studies of the “EPP-QoL” showed that the well-being domain had poor psychometric properties and was removed from the final questionnaire, resulting in only a unidimensional “EPP Symptom” score.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%