Association of Poor Family Functioning From Pregnancy Onward With Preadolescent Behavior and Subcortical Brain Development

Abstract

IMPORTANCEThe association of poor family functioning, a potent stressor, with child behavior is potentially long term and relevant for a person's well-being later in life. Whether changes in brain development underlie the associations with preadolescent behavior and help identify periods of vulnerability is unclear.OBJECTIVE To assess the associations of poor family functioning from pregnancy onward with cortical, white matter, and subcortical volumes, and to examine the extent to which, in particular, hippocampal volume mediates the association of prenatal parental environmental exposures with child problem behavior in preadolescence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThis population-based cohort study, conducted from April 2002 to January 2006, was embedded in Generation R, a multiethnic population-based cohort from fetal life onward. All pregnant women living in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, with an expected delivery date between April 2002 and January 2006 were invited to participate. Of the 8879 pregnant women enrolled during pregnancy, 1266 mothers with no partner data and 490 with missing family functioning data were excluded, as well as 1 sibling of 32 twin pairs. After excluding an additional 657 children with poor imaging data quality or incidental findings, the final sample consisted of 2583 mother-child pairs. Data analysis was performed from March 1, 2019, to June 28, 2019.EXPOSURES Mother-and father-rated poor family functioning was repeatedly measured by the General Functioning subscale of the Family Assessment Device.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Our primary hypothesis, formulated after data collection but before analysis, was that poor prenatal family functioning would be associated with smaller hippocampal and amygdala volumes in late childhood. High-resolution structural neuroimaging data of children aged 10 years were collected with a single 3-T magnetic resonance imaging system. Child emotional and behavioral problems were assessed with the Child Behavior Checklist. RESULTS Data were available for 2583 children (mean [SD] age, 10.1 [0.6] years; 1315 girls [50.9%]). Data for parents included 2583 mothers (mean [SD] age, 31.1 [4.7] years; 1617 Dutch race/ethnicity [62.6%]) and 1788 fathers (mean [SD] age, 33.5 [5.3] years; 1239 Dutch race/ethnicity [69.3%]). Children exposed to prenatal maternal-reported poor family functioning had smaller hippocampal (B = −0.08; 95% CI, −0.13 to −0.02) and occipital lobe (B = −0.70; 95% CI, −1.19 to −0.21) volumes in preadolescence. There was no evidence for an association of exposure to poor family functioning at mid-or late childhood with brain morphology. Hippocampal volumes partially mediated the association of prenatal maternal-reported poor family functioning with preadolescent problem behavior (B = 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03-0.13), even after adjusting for prior child problems at age 1.5 years. Analyses of combined maternal and paternal family functioning ratings showed similar results, but associations were largely driven by maternal family functioning reports. CONC...

Harsh Parenting and Child Brain Morphology: A Population-Based Study

“…Parental alcohol abuse has been suggested to influence child psychological development (Raitasalo et al, 2019), and the likelihood of child maltreatment is higher in families where parents abuse alcohol (Dube et al, 2001). Similarly, family dysfunction has been associated with more parental harsh discipline (Jansen et al, 2012) and with offspring brain morphology (Xerxa, Delaney, et al, 2020). We further explored associations observed in the main analyses, by adjusting, first, for maternal regular drinking problems and binge drinking; and second, for marital problems.…”

Climate Change and Children’s Mental Health: A Developmental Perspective

“…More broadly, slow-moving psychosocial stressors driven by climate change, such as economic downturns, reduced agricultural yields, forced migration, and civil conflict, can have direct effects on maternal stress and, thus, pregnancy outcomes ( Olson & Metz, 2020 ). If persistent, these stressors will continue to undermine the child’s healthy development after the birth, initially mediated by parents’ resources and the quality of parenting they can deliver ( Xerxa et al, 2021 ) and, later, directly through psychosocial stressors within the family (microsystem), educational (mesosystem), and societal (exosystems and macrosystems) environments that the child occupies ( R. Williams et al, 2021 ).…”

Associations of family income with cognition and brain structure in USA children: prevention implications

“…Other relevant factors influenced by SES that affect brain development include recreational activities such as time spent on passive or interactive screen media activity (SMA) [ 24 , 25 ], family composition and interactions (e.g., number of siblings, SIB, biological parents, and adults living with the child) [ 26 , 27 ], and neighborhood deprivation [ 15 , 28 ]. Thus in our analyses we included SMA considering that 97% of US children have at least one electronic item in their bedrooms [ 29 ], SIB considering that the number of only-child families in the ABCD study is relatively high (67%) and neighborhood deprivation.…”