2022
DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s367673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Polymorphisms in Antioxidant Enzyme-Encoding Genes with Diabetic Nephropathy in a Group of Saudi Arabian Patients with Type II Diabetes Mellitus

Abstract: Introduction An imbalance between reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and the defence mechanisms underlying the activity of antioxidant enzymes has been demonstrated as the leading pathology in diabetes mellitus (DM)-related microvascular complications. Purpose This study aims to evaluate the association between polymorphisms in antioxidant enzyme-encoding genes: catalase (CAT); manganese superoxide dismutase (Mn-SOD); glutathione S transferase M1 (GSTM1); and GSTT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 is excluded from the full text. As a result, 48 studies ( Fujita et al, 2000 ; Yang et al, 2004 ; Hayek et al, 2006 ; Wang et al, 2006 ; Hori et al, 2007 ; Yalin et al, 2007 ; Oniki et al, 2008 ; Nowier et al, 2009 ; Tiwari et al, 2009 ; Bid et al, 2010 ; Datta et al, 2010 ; Amer et al, 2011 ; Ramprasath et al, 2011 ; Tsai et al, 2011 ; Amer et al, 2012 ; Cilenšek et al, 2012 ; Gonul et al, 2012 ; Jana and Petrovic., 2012 ; Moasser et al, 2012 ; Dadbinpour et al, 2013 ; Grubisa et al, 2013 ; Mastana et al, 2013 ; Pinheiro et al, 2013 ; Vats et al, 2013 ; Abbasi et al, 2014 ; Al-Badran and Al-Mayah, 2014 ; Moasser et al, 2014 ; Purkait et al, 2014 ; Rao et al, 2014 ; Raza et al, 2014 ; Afrand et al, 2015 ; Rasheed et al, 2015 ; Stoian et al, 2015 ; Zaki et al, 2015 ; Etemad et al, 2016 ; Mergani et al, 2016 ; Mir et al, 2016 ; Rasheed et al, 2016 ; Ahmed and Al-Bachary, 2017 ; Azarova et al, 2018 ; de Lima et al, 2018 ; Abbas et al, 2019 ; Osman et al, 2019 ; Klusek et al, 2020 ; Pourkeramati et al, 2020 ; Gusti et al, 2021 ; Albeladi et al, 2022 ; Jamil et al, 2022 ) were included ( Figure 1 ). There were 28 articles (involving 4,878 cases and 4,621 controls, Table 1 ) on the GSTM1 present/null polymorphism, 28 articles (involving 4,710 cases and 4,471 controls, Table 2 ) on the GSTT1 present/null polymorphism, 24 studies on the GSTP1 IIe105Val polymorphism (including 4,297 cases and 4,244 controls, Table 3 ),17 studies inc...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 is excluded from the full text. As a result, 48 studies ( Fujita et al, 2000 ; Yang et al, 2004 ; Hayek et al, 2006 ; Wang et al, 2006 ; Hori et al, 2007 ; Yalin et al, 2007 ; Oniki et al, 2008 ; Nowier et al, 2009 ; Tiwari et al, 2009 ; Bid et al, 2010 ; Datta et al, 2010 ; Amer et al, 2011 ; Ramprasath et al, 2011 ; Tsai et al, 2011 ; Amer et al, 2012 ; Cilenšek et al, 2012 ; Gonul et al, 2012 ; Jana and Petrovic., 2012 ; Moasser et al, 2012 ; Dadbinpour et al, 2013 ; Grubisa et al, 2013 ; Mastana et al, 2013 ; Pinheiro et al, 2013 ; Vats et al, 2013 ; Abbasi et al, 2014 ; Al-Badran and Al-Mayah, 2014 ; Moasser et al, 2014 ; Purkait et al, 2014 ; Rao et al, 2014 ; Raza et al, 2014 ; Afrand et al, 2015 ; Rasheed et al, 2015 ; Stoian et al, 2015 ; Zaki et al, 2015 ; Etemad et al, 2016 ; Mergani et al, 2016 ; Mir et al, 2016 ; Rasheed et al, 2016 ; Ahmed and Al-Bachary, 2017 ; Azarova et al, 2018 ; de Lima et al, 2018 ; Abbas et al, 2019 ; Osman et al, 2019 ; Klusek et al, 2020 ; Pourkeramati et al, 2020 ; Gusti et al, 2021 ; Albeladi et al, 2022 ; Jamil et al, 2022 ) were included ( Figure 1 ). There were 28 articles (involving 4,878 cases and 4,621 controls, Table 1 ) on the GSTM1 present/null polymorphism, 28 articles (involving 4,710 cases and 4,471 controls, Table 2 ) on the GSTT1 present/null polymorphism, 24 studies on the GSTP1 IIe105Val polymorphism (including 4,297 cases and 4,244 controls, Table 3 ),17 studies inc...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T2DM patients who have the TT genotype in -262 C/T may have elevated risk of diabetes complications; these patients had the lowest mean CAT and HDL, as well as the highest glucose, HbA1 and TCH levels [ 57 ]. Additionally, there is evidence that CAT polymorphism is associated with diabetes complications, such as distal symmetric polyneuropathy, nephropathy, retinopathy and risk factors for its development [ 20 , 25 , 58 , 59 ]. In view of the significant relationship between T2DM and NAFLD [ 9 ], and the discussion related to the sequence of development of these pathologies as well as the etiopathogenetic factors involved in this process, it is worth considering the role of CAT, its genotypes and alleles in this process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to genetic factors, the CAT level can be affected by age, seasonality, physical activity or the number of chemical compounds [ 18 , 19 ]. Alterations in the expression of the CAT gene and the CAT protein level have been reported in a wide variety of diseases, and polymorphisms in the CAT gene have been shown to be associated with various pathophysiological conditions, such as IR, T2DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), gestational diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, HA, Alzheimer’s disease, breast cancer and therapy, asthma, osteonecrosis, elderly re-nutrition, and bone mineral density [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Some studies indicate a relationship between selected CAT polymorphisms and liver damage caused by chemical compounds [ 29 ], alcohol [ 30 ], medications such as valproic acid [ 31 ], hepatitis C and B viruses [ 32 , 33 ], as well as the presence of NASH [ 34 ] and HCC [ 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of a previous study conducted on the same population contradicts our results regarding SOD2 rs4880 expression. 33 However, our study included a healthy control group, leading to differences in inclusion criteria. Furthermore, we validated our results using robust Sanger sequencing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%