2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1525-1578(10)60510-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor α Mutations with Gastric Primary Site and Epithelioid or Mixed Cell Morphology in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Abstract: Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) carry activating mutations of the KIT gene encoding the receptor tyrosine kinase KIT. In a previous study we were able to show an association between the lack of KIT mutations (wild-type GISTs) and the presence of a significant epithelioid tumor component. A very recent study described the occurrence of PDGFRalpha mutations in KIT wt GISTS. Therefore, we studied a panel of 87 GISTs for mutations in the hot spot regions of the PDGFRalpha gene with single strand confo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
102
2
10

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(27 reference statements)
9
102
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, as discussed below, both genotypes are associated with cytogenetic changes that are distinctive for GIST. 37,43 Despite these molecular similarities, PDGFRAmutant GISTs do show features distinctive from KIT-mutant GISTs, including differences in gene expression profile, 39,44 a striking predilection for the stomach, variable (sometimes negative) expression of KIT, 20,41,[45][46][47][48] and a generally lower potential for malignancy. 49 Morphologically, however, PDGFRAmutant GISTs are not reliably distinguishable from KIT-mutant GISTs ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Platelet-derived Growth Factor Receptor-amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, as discussed below, both genotypes are associated with cytogenetic changes that are distinctive for GIST. 37,43 Despite these molecular similarities, PDGFRAmutant GISTs do show features distinctive from KIT-mutant GISTs, including differences in gene expression profile, 39,44 a striking predilection for the stomach, variable (sometimes negative) expression of KIT, 20,41,[45][46][47][48] and a generally lower potential for malignancy. 49 Morphologically, however, PDGFRAmutant GISTs are not reliably distinguishable from KIT-mutant GISTs ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Platelet-derived Growth Factor Receptor-amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the predominance of the epithelioid/mixed phenotypes in PDGFRA-mutant GISTs demonstrated in several previous studies 7,8,[13][14][15] suggests a primary commitment of this subset of GISTs toward an epithelioid phenotype. This view is supported by the generally favorable clinical course of PDGFRAmutated GISTs, which contrasts with our findings in epithelioid/mixed KIT-mutant GISTs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…6 On the other hand, the majority of PDGFRA-mutated GISTs display epithelioid or mixed (predominantly epithelioid) phenotypes. 7,8 Intriguingly, data on the correlation of the histological subtype with the clinical outcome have been inconsistent. The presence of an epithelioid/mixed morphology/ component in GISTs was associated with malignant behavior in GISTs in several studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,20,21 PDGFRA-mutated GISTs show a preference for gastric location, epithelioid morphology, variable or absent KIT expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and a more indolent clinical behavior. 21,22 In about 10% of patients, no detectable mutation is identified in either KIT or PDGFRA. In particular, GISTs that occur in pediatric or neurofibromatosis type I patients are nearly always wild type (ie not mutated) for both genes.…”
Section: Review Of Kit and Pdgfra Biologymentioning
confidence: 99%