Association of osteopenia and osteoporosis with higher rates of pseudarthrosis and revision surgery in adult patients undergoing single-level lumbar fusion
Abstract:OBJECTIVEPatients with osteopenia or osteoporosis who require surgery for symptomatic degenerative spondylolisthesis may have higher rates of postoperative pseudarthrosis and need for revision surgery than patients with normal bone mineral densities (BMDs). To this end, the authors compared rates of postoperative pseudarthrosis and need for revision surgery following single-level lumbar fusion in patients with normal BMD with those in patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis. The secondary outcome was to inves… Show more
“…It has been well proven that surgical complications, such as instrument failure (cage migration, screw loosening, and pseudarthrosis) and subsequent vertebral compression fractures, correlate with osteoporosis. 24,25 Both PS loosening and cage migration are correlated with an increase in back pain, rate of nonunion, and pseudarthrosis, leading to poor quality of life. 26,27 In the treatment of elder patients with osteoporotic LDD, many surgical techniques have hsve shown satisfactory fusion rates and good stability, including cement augmentation of PS, expandable PSs, and CBT-screw fixation.…”
This was a prospective randomized controlled trial study. Objective: To elucidate clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications of cortical bone trajectory (CBT)-screw fixation in patients with osteoporosis at 24-month follow-up and to compare the results with those after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using traditional pedicle screw (PS) fixation. Methods: We enrolled 124 patients and randomly assigned them to two groups (each group had 62 participants). The primary outcome was fusion rate. Secondary outcomes were VAS, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, operation duration, incision length, estimated blood loss, drainage volume, radiological outcomes, and complications. Results: At the 6-and 12-month follow-up points, similar fusion rates were observed based on CT scans in both groups (P=0.583 and 0.583). CBT provided significantly better short-term functional status at 3 months postoperation on ODI and JOA scores (P=0.012 and 0) and similar improvements in pain intensity and functional status at other follow-up points. In addition, CBT resulted in significantly better surgical characteristics. Notably, CBT fixation led to lower incidence of screw loosening (P=0.006). Conclusion: CBT-screw fixation for single-level lumbar fusion in patients with osteoporosis provided improvement in clinical symptoms comparable to that of TLIF using PS fixation. Significantly better lumbar stability was found in the CBT group. We suggest that CBT-screw fixation is a reasonable and superior alternative to PS in TLIF in osteoporosis.
“…It has been well proven that surgical complications, such as instrument failure (cage migration, screw loosening, and pseudarthrosis) and subsequent vertebral compression fractures, correlate with osteoporosis. 24,25 Both PS loosening and cage migration are correlated with an increase in back pain, rate of nonunion, and pseudarthrosis, leading to poor quality of life. 26,27 In the treatment of elder patients with osteoporotic LDD, many surgical techniques have hsve shown satisfactory fusion rates and good stability, including cement augmentation of PS, expandable PSs, and CBT-screw fixation.…”
This was a prospective randomized controlled trial study. Objective: To elucidate clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications of cortical bone trajectory (CBT)-screw fixation in patients with osteoporosis at 24-month follow-up and to compare the results with those after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using traditional pedicle screw (PS) fixation. Methods: We enrolled 124 patients and randomly assigned them to two groups (each group had 62 participants). The primary outcome was fusion rate. Secondary outcomes were VAS, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, operation duration, incision length, estimated blood loss, drainage volume, radiological outcomes, and complications. Results: At the 6-and 12-month follow-up points, similar fusion rates were observed based on CT scans in both groups (P=0.583 and 0.583). CBT provided significantly better short-term functional status at 3 months postoperation on ODI and JOA scores (P=0.012 and 0) and similar improvements in pain intensity and functional status at other follow-up points. In addition, CBT resulted in significantly better surgical characteristics. Notably, CBT fixation led to lower incidence of screw loosening (P=0.006). Conclusion: CBT-screw fixation for single-level lumbar fusion in patients with osteoporosis provided improvement in clinical symptoms comparable to that of TLIF using PS fixation. Significantly better lumbar stability was found in the CBT group. We suggest that CBT-screw fixation is a reasonable and superior alternative to PS in TLIF in osteoporosis.
“…Smoking, metabolic disorders, surgical instrumentation and technique, and fusion location have been demonstrated as the risk factors for pseudarthrosis ( 103 , 104 ). In addition to this, osteopenia and osteoporosis have been suggested as another risk factor for pseudarthrosis, and implant failure, such as screw loosening ( 105 , 106 ). Post-operative back pain was reported in the patients undergoing lumbar fusion procedures.…”
Section: Non-surgical Treatment—the Foremost Option For Ldh Patients ...mentioning
Lumbar disc herniation is among the common phenotypes of degenerative lumbar spine diseases, significantly affecting patients' quality of life. The practice pattern is diverse. Choosing conservative measures or surgical treatments is still controversial in some areas. For those who have failed conservative treatment, surgery with or without instrumentation is recommended, causing significant expenditures and frustrating complications, that should not be ignored. In the article, we performed a literature review and summarized the evidence by subheadings to unravel the cons of surgical intervention for lumbar disc herniation. There are tetrad critical issues about surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation, i.e., favorable natural history, insufficient evidence in a recommendation of fusion surgery for patients, metallosis, and implant removal. Firstly, accumulating evidence reveals immune privilege and auto-immunity hallmarks of human lumbar discs within the closed niche. Progenitor cells within human discs further expand the capacity with the endogenous repair. Clinical watchful follow-up studies with repeated diagnostic imaging reveal spontaneous resolution for lumbar disc herniation, even calcified tissues. Secondly, emerging evidence indicates long-term complications of lumbar fusion, such as adjacent segment disease, pseudarthrosis, implant failure, and sagittal spinal imbalance, which get increasing attention. Thirdly, systemic and local reactions (metallosis) for metal instrumentation have been noted with long-term health concerns and toxicity. Fourthly, the indications and timing for spinal implant removal have not reached a consensus. Other challenging issues include postoperative lumbar stiffness. The review provided evidence from a negative perspective for surgeons and patients who attempt to choose surgical treatment. Collectively, the emerging underlying evidence questions the benefits of traditional surgery for patients with lumbar disc herniation. Therefore, the long-term effects of surgery should be closely observed. Surgical decisions should be made prudently for each patient.
“…Optimizing medical conditions prior to spine surgery is being increasingly performed to improve outcomes, and avert adverse events [19]. Khalid, et al [20] reported higher rates of postoperative pseudoarthrosis and revision surgery following a single-level lumbar spinal fusion in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis compared to patients with normal Bone mineral densities (BMD). The authors note that pretreatment with medications to prevent bone loss prior to surgery decreased complication rates.…”
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a common cause of spinal cord dysfunction. The degenerative disease can cause serious neurological symptoms that can significantly affect the quality of life. The heterogenous presentation of CSM and a lack of a single comprehensive outcome instrument can make the management of suspected CSM very difficult. Despite the advances in surgical techniques to treat CSM, the indications to do surgery remain controversial, particularly in older individuals who commonly present with the disease. There is also debate on the optimal surgical approach to treat CSM, and most neurosurgeons remain unfamiliar with the evaluation tools that drive economic health care as a result of the surgical procedures. Here, the scientific literature was carried out using PubMed with the following keywords: cervical spondylotic myelopathy, anterior, posterior, anterior-posterior, elderly, cost-utility analyses. The bibliographies of these papers were also reviewed to yield additional papers of high significance. The goal of this review is to provide insight in to the surgical outcomes, preoperative management decisions, elderly population, and the cost-effectiveness of the types of surgery in relation to cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.