2010
DOI: 10.1539/joh.o10002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Occupation, Employment Contract, and Company Size with Mental Health in a National Representative Sample of Employees in Japan

Abstract: Association of Occupation, Employment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
57
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
57
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding in this study that lower income was associated with a higher prevalence of psychological distress is in line with previous studies in which the association was generally dose-responsive [12][13][14]20]. In this study, however, the association appeared to show a threshold.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The finding in this study that lower income was associated with a higher prevalence of psychological distress is in line with previous studies in which the association was generally dose-responsive [12][13][14]20]. In this study, however, the association appeared to show a threshold.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, these findings were primarily based on particular job categories, and no largescale nationwide survey has been conducted on this topic. In Japan, only a few studies have compared precariously and permanently employed workers 19,20) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we calculated the relative poverty rate by employment contract and household structure based on the definition described above. In line with previous studies based on data from the CSLC 29,35) , we did not adjust the sample weights because the CSLC is not strictly based on probabilistic sampling and the sample weights the government offers are only useful for expanding the estimated totals of the number of households or household members from a sample to the subnational level 26) . All analyses were conducted using R version 2.12.2 36) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, selection bias caused by nonresponse or missing values could have influenced our results, although the response rates were relatively high in this field (76−79%). Fourth, we did not deal with the effect of clusters (i.e., census tracts and households), as we followed the methods of previous studies based on data from the CSLC to maintain comparability 29,35) . Because we analyzed data by sex and restricted the age range of participants, the cluster effect of households may be limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%