2018
DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix1109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status With Risk of Infection and Sepsis

Abstract: Our study shows that differential infection risk may explain nSES disparities in sepsis incidence, as higher nSES is associated with lower infection hospitalization rates, but there is no association with sepsis among those hospitalized. Mediation analysis showed that nSES may influence infection hospitalization risk at least partially through physical weakness, individual income, and comorbid diabetes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the disjunctive cause criterion (VanderWeele and Shpitser 2011 ) for confounder identification, we included age (in years), sex, socioeconomic status (SES) (Donnelly et al 2018 ), history of stroke (Chamorro et al 2007 ), any kind of cancer (Rolston 2017 ), myocardial infarction (Truffa et al 2012 ), diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2 (Casqueiro et al 2012 ), smoking status (Bagaitkar et al 2008 ), BMI (kg/m 2 ; with BMI > 30 defined as obese according to WHO definition (Dobner and Kaser 2018 ; WHO 2019 )), and hypertension as potential confounders (Gu et al 2017 ). All potential confounders were assessed as self-reported variables at baseline only, using a standardized interview.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the disjunctive cause criterion (VanderWeele and Shpitser 2011 ) for confounder identification, we included age (in years), sex, socioeconomic status (SES) (Donnelly et al 2018 ), history of stroke (Chamorro et al 2007 ), any kind of cancer (Rolston 2017 ), myocardial infarction (Truffa et al 2012 ), diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2 (Casqueiro et al 2012 ), smoking status (Bagaitkar et al 2008 ), BMI (kg/m 2 ; with BMI > 30 defined as obese according to WHO definition (Dobner and Kaser 2018 ; WHO 2019 )), and hypertension as potential confounders (Gu et al 2017 ). All potential confounders were assessed as self-reported variables at baseline only, using a standardized interview.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socioeconomic status, including access to care, has a substantial impact on sepsis incidence and outcomes. [28][29][30][31][32] In the present study, we assessed the socioeconomic status using urbanization levels, which may reflect access to care, and payrollrelated insurance premium. We found that both urbanization levels and payroll-related insured amount were associated with sepsis risk in a doseresponse manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from epidemiological studies are contrasting [45][46][47]. Ethnicity may also be associated with socioeconomic status, a health determinant recently found to be associated with a higher rate of hospital admissions for infection [48]. Future tracking of health-related social needs in structured EHR data [49] will support deeper investigation.…”
Section: Principal Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%