Association of Neighborhood Environment with the Outcomes of Childhood Glaucoma

Elhusseiny, Abdelrahman M.; Oke, Isdin; Adomfeh, Jean; Chauhan, Muhammad Z.; VanderVeen, Deborah K.

doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2023.06.001

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, we can speculate how social determinants of health might be associated with the observed diversity trends . Social determinants of health encompass various factors, such as educational attainment, income, social support, and physical environment, that can affect an individual’s health, opportunities, and trajectory in the field of medicine . Furthermore, our study is intrinsically retrospective and relies on self-reported data.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…34 Social determinants of health encompass various factors, such as educational attainment, income, social support, and physical environment, that can affect an individual's health, opportunities, and trajectory in the field of medicine. [35][36][37][38] Furthermore, our study is intrinsically retrospective and relies on self-reported data. Although the AAMC Faculty Roster data are generally robust and widely used in health care disparities research, potential inaccuracies may exist due to the voluntary nature of reporting race and gender.…”

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Ophthalmology Faculty Diversity Trends in the US

Ali,

Chauhan,

Doty

et al. 2023

JAMA Ophthalmol

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ImportanceEnhancing the diversity of ophthalmologists can potentially contribute to diminishing disparities in eye care.ObjectivesTo investigate longitudinal trends in the representation of individuals underrepresented in medicine (URiM) and women among ophthalmology faculty compared with other specialties and to assess disparities between ophthalmology faculty demographic characteristics and the US population.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this cross-sectional study, a comprehensive analysis of Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty Roster data between 2000 and 2021 was conducted, using data from the US Medical School Faculty report on 56 438 ophthalmology faculty members.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe data set was used to differentiate ophthalmology faculty members by gender, rank, and designation as a URiM individual. Outcome measures included changes in URiM and non-URiM faculty proportions, faculty rank, gender, department chair positions, and the US population between 2000 and 2021.ResultsA total of 56 438 ophthalmology faculty members (37 511 men [66.5%]) were included in the study. The number of ophthalmology faculty increased from 1820 in 2000 to 3151 in 2021. Across all years, URiM female faculty represented 3.1% of ophthalmologists (1733 of 56 438), while URiM men accounted for 3.5% (1983 of 56 438). Overall, non-URiM men constituted 63.0% of ophthalmologists (35 528 of 56 438), and non-URiM women accounted for 30.5% (17 194 of 56 438). The proportion of URiM male faculty remained stable from 2000 to 2021 (63 of 1820 [3.5%] vs 104 of 3151 [3.3%]), with a small increase in URiM women faculty at junior faculty positions (2000, 40 of 1820 [2.2%]; 2021, 129 of 3151 [4.1%]; difference, 1.9% [95% CI, 0.9%-2.9%]). Proportions of non-URiM men decreased from 71.2% (1295 of 1820) in 2000 to 55.3% (1743 of 3151) in 2021 (difference, 15.8% [95% CI, 13.1%-18.6%]) and proportions of non-URiM women increased from 23.2% (422 of 1820) in 2000 to 37.3% (1175 of 3151) in 2021 (difference, 14.1% [95% CI, 11.5%-16.7%]). In terms of faculty rank, there were increases in representation of women from 2000 to 2021 at assistant professor (from 11.2% [203 of 1819] to 19.7% [622 of 3165]; difference, 8.5% [95% CI, 6.5%-10.5%]), associate professor (from 4.6% [83 of 1819] to 8.6% [271 of 3165]; difference, 4.0% [95% CI, 2.6%-5.4%]), and professor levels (from 2.8% [51 of 1819] to 7.1% [223 of 3165]; difference, 4.3% [95% CI, 3.9%-6.1%]). URiM representation remained stable at most ranks. Compared with other specialties, ophthalmology had among the lowest percentage change in URiM faculty. The expansion of ophthalmology’s URiM faculty representation was less than one-third that of the diverse US population.Conclusion and RelevanceThese findings highlight substantial growth in ophthalmology faculty and an increase in women’s representation across several faculty ranks. However, URiM representation has remained largely unchanged, despite an increase at the associate professor level. This finding emphasizes the need for continued efforts to enhance diversity in academic ophthalmology.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%